MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Baby Donkey Kong: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== <div class="boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify;-moz-border-radius:20px; background: #E9AB17...")
 
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="image-needed" style="text-align: justify;-moz-border-radius:20px; background: #E9AB17; color:black; margin: .5em 2%; padding: 0 1em; border: 1px dotted orangered">
{{FA archive notice
The "'''{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}'''" article was nominated for Featured Article status at ''{{{10:19 EST November 5, 2012}}}''.
|Baby Donkey Kong was nominated for featured article at 15:20, November 5, 2012 and passed at 17:58, 29 December, 2012
{{#if:{{{passed}}}|:"'''{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}'''" has met FA status requirements at ''{{{passed}}}'', and will become a featured article at ''{{#time: H:i, j F Y |{{{passed}}} +163 hours}}'' if unopposed.}}
}}
</div>[[Category:FA nomination pages|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
 
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|DKPetey99}} - I've read through this article and tidied up some parts where necessary. And I conclude, that this article is in good shape and deserves to be a consideration for Featured Articles. For a character who has appeared in only 2 games, his role is big and I feel details are present in the articles. I also added a [[Baby Donkey Kong#Powers and Abilities|Powers and Abilities]] section. His in game sections give detail and his part in the storylines. His physical appearance and personality goes into pretty good detail. All and all, I say this article lacks little to no missing detail. I feel it has the potential to be a Featured Article.
#{{User|DKPetey99}} - I've read through this article and tidied up some parts where necessary. And I conclude, that this article is in good shape and deserves to be a consideration for Featured Articles. For a character who has appeared in only 2 games, his role is big and I feel details are present in the articles. I also added a [[Baby Donkey Kong#Powers and Abilities|Powers and Abilities]] section. His in game sections give detail and his part in the storylines. His physical appearance and personality goes into pretty good detail. All and all, I say this article lacks little to no missing detail. I feel it has the potential to be a Featured Article.
#{{User|SmartYoshi}}
#{{User|Mariobros1985}}
#{{User|Megadardery}}
#{{User|BowserJunior}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 15: Line 17:
==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Please excuse that I forgot the deadline requirements, so would anyone mind putting that in for me? {{User|DKPetey99}}
Please excuse that I forgot the deadline requirements, so would anyone mind putting that in for me? {{User|DKPetey99}}
:Solved. {{User|YoshiKong}} 18:44, 5 November 2012 (EST)
{{User|Mariobros1985}} It's now supported 5-0, why isn't the article featured?
:I'm taking care of that now. {{User|YoshiKong}} 07:25, 31 December 2012 (EST)

Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024

Baby Donkey Kong[edit]

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.


Support[edit]

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) - I've read through this article and tidied up some parts where necessary. And I conclude, that this article is in good shape and deserves to be a consideration for Featured Articles. For a character who has appeared in only 2 games, his role is big and I feel details are present in the articles. I also added a Powers and Abilities section. His in game sections give detail and his part in the storylines. His physical appearance and personality goes into pretty good detail. All and all, I say this article lacks little to no missing detail. I feel it has the potential to be a Featured Article.
  2. SmartYoshi (talk)
  3. Mariobros1985 (talk)
  4. Megadardery (talk)
  5. BowserJunior (talk)

Oppose[edit]

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

Please excuse that I forgot the deadline requirements, so would anyone mind putting that in for me? DKPetey99 (talk)

Solved. YoshiKong (talk) 18:44, 5 November 2012 (EST)

Mariobros1985 (talk) It's now supported 5-0, why isn't the article featured?

I'm taking care of that now. YoshiKong (talk) 07:25, 31 December 2012 (EST)