MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/New Super Mario Bros. Mii: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
m (Text replacement - "‎" to "")
 
(29 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=08:33, 24 July 2012‎
|nominated=08:33, 24 July 2012
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=18:42, 21 october 2012
|nosupport=true
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Spenzer66}} I surely agree, its wonderful  
#{{User|Spenzer66}} I surely agree, its wonderful
#{{User|Jose17796}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} First, "its wonderful" is not a good reason. How is it wonderful? You need to elaborate on that. Also, who are you agreeing with? The article itself is incredibly lackluster. I know we can't exactly add much info to a tech demo, but that's precisely why it can't be a featured article. It's just a relatively small intro, a list, and a single trivia piece. For a featured ''list'', that could work, but this is supposed to be an article, so no go.
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} First, "its wonderful" is not a good reason. How is it wonderful? You need to elaborate on that. Also, who are you agreeing with? The article itself is incredibly lackluster. I know we can't exactly add much info to a tech demo, but that's precisely why it can't be a featured article. It's just a relatively small intro, a list, and a single trivia piece. For a featured ''list'', that could work, but this is supposed to be an article, so no go.
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per GreenDisaster.
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} Per GreenDisaster. If I felt like it, I bet I could correctly ''count'' the amout of words on this article.
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} This article is just a list. It wouldn't even work as a featured list because... Well I don't even have to say it
#{{user|Bloc Partier}} - Terrible. Why is this even still a nomination? There is no way it will ever meet the word count, nor is it even a true list.
#{{user|Mario jc}} Per all.
#{{User|Lakituthequick}} Le per all.
#{{User|MeritC}} Wha...? No. Just no. This even wouldn't fit criteria to be a featured article at all.
#{{User|Master R.O.B}} Nothing I can say that the other opposers haven't already said.
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Doesn't seem wonderful, nor feature standard to ''any'' extent. Per all.
#{{User|Exo}} Per all. There's nothing on this page!
#{{User|LuigiBlubber}} This shouldn't become featured! It's a tech demo!
#{{User|Tails777}} Per all, it's not really even an article, it's just a list of things that would have been in a game.
#{{User|The 463}} To be honest, I don't see the point in this being here. maybe on the mario wikia, but not here. Let alone it being a featured article here.
#{{User|Koopa K}} It is too short.
#{{User|World10}} All per.
#{{User|LightningBlue}} First off it is a game that has not even been released yet. Not to mention there is very little information on it at this point.
#{{User|Mariobros1985}} This game won't even be released; New Super Mario Bros U should be featured instead.
#{{User|Akfamilyhome}} Wow, seriously? I mean, this is a page about a tech demo, with little amount of info, with just a list of characters and objects. Per all. This really should not be a featured article.
#{{User|MarioSmasher}} This makes me wonder why the proposal for "Enforce Support Reasoning for FA Nominations" was MAJORILY opposed and led to nonsense reasons while nominating.
#{{User|MarioGameChampion}} I don't really think I need an explanation.
#{{User|Mario Fan 123}} Per all. Is the reason for featuring the article even serious? Sounds more like a joke.
#{{User|Ultramariologan}} Per all, and it doesn't really have much pictures. I know, it has a gallery and all, but it doesn't even have any actual artwork.
#{{User|Vommack}} As a featured list, I would very well support it, but the problem is, this isn't supposed to be a list.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Latest revision as of 13:43, September 4, 2021

New Super Mario Bros. Mii[edit]

New Super Mario Bros. Mii was nominated for Featured Article status at 08:33, 24 July 2012.

New Super Mario Bros. Mii failed FA status requirements at 18:42, 21 October 2012, and can currently be renominated.


Support[edit]

  1. Spenzer66 (talk) I surely agree, its wonderful
  2. Jose17796 (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. GreenDisaster (talk) First, "its wonderful" is not a good reason. How is it wonderful? You need to elaborate on that. Also, who are you agreeing with? The article itself is incredibly lackluster. I know we can't exactly add much info to a tech demo, but that's precisely why it can't be a featured article. It's just a relatively small intro, a list, and a single trivia piece. For a featured list, that could work, but this is supposed to be an article, so no go.
  2. Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per GreenDisaster. If I felt like it, I bet I could correctly count the amout of words on this article.
  3. Commander Code-8 (talk) This article is just a list. It wouldn't even work as a featured list because... Well I don't even have to say it
  4. Bloc Partier (talk) - Terrible. Why is this even still a nomination? There is no way it will ever meet the word count, nor is it even a true list.
  5. Mario jc (talk) Per all.
  6. Lakituthequick (talk) Le per all.
  7. MeritC (talk) Wha...? No. Just no. This even wouldn't fit criteria to be a featured article at all.
  8. Master R.O.B (talk) Nothing I can say that the other opposers haven't already said.
  9. YoshiKong (talk) Doesn't seem wonderful, nor feature standard to any extent. Per all.
  10. Exo (talk) Per all. There's nothing on this page!
  11. LuigiBlubber (talk) This shouldn't become featured! It's a tech demo!
  12. Tails777 (talk) Per all, it's not really even an article, it's just a list of things that would have been in a game.
  13. The 463 (talk) To be honest, I don't see the point in this being here. maybe on the mario wikia, but not here. Let alone it being a featured article here.
  14. Koopa K (talk) It is too short.
  15. World10 (talk) All per.
  16. LightningBlue (talk) First off it is a game that has not even been released yet. Not to mention there is very little information on it at this point.
  17. Mariobros1985 (talk) This game won't even be released; New Super Mario Bros U should be featured instead.
  18. Akfamilyhome (talk) Wow, seriously? I mean, this is a page about a tech demo, with little amount of info, with just a list of characters and objects. Per all. This really should not be a featured article.
  19. MarioSmasher (talk) This makes me wonder why the proposal for "Enforce Support Reasoning for FA Nominations" was MAJORILY opposed and led to nonsense reasons while nominating.
  20. MarioGameChampion (talk) I don't really think I need an explanation.
  21. Mario Fan 123 (talk) Per all. Is the reason for featuring the article even serious? Sounds more like a joke.
  22. Ultramariologan (talk) Per all, and it doesn't really have much pictures. I know, it has a gallery and all, but it doesn't even have any actual artwork.
  23. Vommack (talk) As a featured list, I would very well support it, but the problem is, this isn't supposed to be a list.

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]

Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/New_Super_Mario_Bros._Mii&oldid=3308649"