MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/King Boo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice}} | ||
King Boo was nominated to be refeatured at 13:46 GMT 23 February, 2012, | '''King Boo was nominated to be refeatured at 13:46 GMT 23 February, 2012, and passed at 20:06 GMT, 23 April 2012'''. | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Super Famicom 64}} I think there is no improvement template. | #{{User|Super Famicom 64}} I think there is no improvement template. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024
King Boo[edit]
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
King Boo was nominated to be refeatured at 13:46 GMT 23 February, 2012, and passed at 20:06 GMT, 23 April 2012.
Support[edit]
- Super Famicom 64 (talk) I think there is no improvement template.
- Hippihippi (talk)
- New Super Yoshi (talk)
- Commander Code-8 (talk)
- LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Oppose[edit]
Removal of Opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
Just saying, you don't use N1 for making nominations. N1 is used for archives. If there is already a created page for it (most likely a redirect), put the active nomination in it. It has N instead. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
I added a rewrite template shortly after making my oppose vote. This template is used after the nomination is created, so saying stuff like, "lolz u didnt c teh temp plate so y u nomin8 it" is not valid. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Um, SuperFamicom, why did you remove the reason for this nomination? We need to know why you think this article merits a featured status. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- He probably got confused over the don't need a reason to surport rule or he didn't like people contradicting his argument it's one of those Raven Effect (talk)
- His vote is invalid then if there is no reason to feature. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Okay, i now need help... Super Famicom 64 (talk)
Okay, first, HOW does the Mario Kart DS section needs help? If people just say, "it's bad", the reason is not valid. After I tried to improve the grammar of the Mario Kart DS, I want to see if anybody notices a difference. I doubt the people who support the user who opposes even read the section. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- It's pretty better now. Super Famicom 64 (talk)
You shouldn't attempt to remove these votes UNTIL the work is finished. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
@SF64 The Mario Party 9 section needs to be longer, then I'll support. New Super Yoshi (talk)
- How much longer? That's pretty enough in my opinion. Super Famicom 64 (talk)
I recently did a major edit on the whole page... Is it good enough yet? King Boo's my favourite character, so I want him Refeatured... If there is something in specific that could need changing, I would gladly do it. MarioComix 00:36, 31 March 2012 (EDT)
