MarioWiki talk:BJAODN/Mario (species): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
YoshiPickle (talk | contribs) |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (Forum.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Luigi (species)? == | == Luigi (species)? == | ||
:Is there a Luigi (species) article here? If not, we should create one, as he is important enough to have his own species (although they probably have already died out, because they stumbled into a Ghost House).[[User:M&L|M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you!]] 17:11, 6 February 2012 (EST) | :Is there a Luigi (species) article here? If not, we should create one, as he is important enough to have his own species (although they probably have already died out, because they stumbled into a Ghost House).[[User:M&L|M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you!]] 17:11, 6 February 2012 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 08:40, May 12, 2012
Luigi (species)?[edit]
- Is there a Luigi (species) article here? If not, we should create one, as he is important enough to have his own species (although they probably have already died out, because they stumbled into a Ghost House).M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you! 17:11, 6 February 2012 (EST)
- Well these article were articles that were actually made at one point and making a Luigi (species) article would be vandalism Raven Effect (talk)
- Oh, so we can't just put one like MarioWikiBJAODN/Luigi (species) so it was always a part of BJAODN and could get a few laughs without being considered vandalism?M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you! 17:14, 6 February 2012 (EST)
- Nope Raven Effect (talk)
- Aww... I really wanted to... oh, well. I'm going to post a list of random things I wanted to say to people on the wiki but can't since I could earn a warning on my talk page, so check it out. It's gonna be awesome!M&L Just because you're in red doesn't mean you're strong. Have at you! 17:18, 6 February 2012 (EST)