MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Shadow Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== {{FANOMSTAT |nominated=02:48 GMT |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth suppo...") |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[ | ===[[Shadow Mario]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice}} | ||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Phoenix}} Article is of adequate length, is written well, accurate, has good pictures, no red links, and generally appears to meet the standards of a Featured Article. | |||
#{{User|Yoshidude99}} | |||
#{{User|Mario4Ever}} | |||
#{{User|UltraMario3000}} | |||
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | |||
#{{User|Tails777}} | |||
#{{User|New Super Mario}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Sheesh, not trying to insult anybody or put anyone down, but the term, "well written" has little meaning. I had to fix up a bunch of errors (including tense, informal phrases, prepositions, etc) at the time this got nominated. Some could have opposed it (read: LeftyGreenMario, ha) because of that. Luckily I fixed all of that. I recommend that in any future nominations that you proof-read before you nominate it! Just a recommendation. Not a demand. I hope we understand :). This article is fine now, there might be several stuff I missed. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
:It can always be fixed up during the nomination process. Minor flaws aren't too much to worry about, so long as there are no improvement tags or anything of the sort. {{User|Mario4Ever}} | |||
::What I found in this article, I could have put a rewrite tag up or a tense tag up if I didn't feel like editing all of that text. I think it's pretty major, IMO, when there are a moderate number of errors in a page this size. {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
@BLOF i think i got everything down. | |||
{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024
Shadow Mario[edit]
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Support[edit]
- Phoenix (talk) Article is of adequate length, is written well, accurate, has good pictures, no red links, and generally appears to meet the standards of a Featured Article.
- Yoshidude99 (talk)
- Mario4Ever (talk)
- UltraMario3000 (talk)
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- Tails777 (talk)
- New Super Mario (talk)
Oppose[edit]
Removal of Opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
Sheesh, not trying to insult anybody or put anyone down, but the term, "well written" has little meaning. I had to fix up a bunch of errors (including tense, informal phrases, prepositions, etc) at the time this got nominated. Some could have opposed it (read: LeftyGreenMario, ha) because of that. Luckily I fixed all of that. I recommend that in any future nominations that you proof-read before you nominate it! Just a recommendation. Not a demand. I hope we understand :). This article is fine now, there might be several stuff I missed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- It can always be fixed up during the nomination process. Minor flaws aren't too much to worry about, so long as there are no improvement tags or anything of the sort. Mario4Ever (talk)
- What I found in this article, I could have put a rewrite tag up or a tense tag up if I didn't feel like editing all of that text. I think it's pretty major, IMO, when there are a moderate number of errors in a page this size. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
@BLOF i think i got everything down. Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
