MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kiddy Kong: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It meets all the standards. What can be added to make it better? | #{{User|Fawfulfury65}} It meets all the standards. What can be added to make it better? | ||
#{{User|Iggykoopa}} yeah i think that it is a really good article considering how little there is to work with | #{{User|Iggykoopa}} yeah i think that it is a really good article considering how little there is to work with | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Here is my simple response: Why do you think it is not quality enough? This article is about as long as it gets! | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
@FF65, yeah just keep it featured! [[User:DKPetey99|DKPetey99]] 18:09, 31 March 2011 (EDT) | @FF65, yeah just keep it featured! [[User:DKPetey99|DKPetey99]] 18:09, 31 March 2011 (EDT) | ||
You should have let the proposal die DX {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
Revision as of 02:17, April 2, 2011
Kiddy Kong
Remove Featured Article Status
- DKPetey99 (talk) I know it is in good shape for a minor character but with the quality and quantity, it's not the best the Wiki has to offer!
Keep Featured Article Status
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) For a character who only appeared in one original game and one comic appearance, this article is simply amazing when it comes to the information. Sure, I'm not sure about the quality of the information (some FAs actually have bad quality writing that I corrected in the past) and I'm not sure if I proofread it yet, but nevertheless, this article still deserves title of featured. Everything that needs to be an FA, this article has it all.
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk) - Per BLOF. It doesn't matter if he only appeared once, the article is very well written (for a character who only appeared once, that is).
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) Per my comments.
- DKC2 King Liam (talk) - That article is long with very good info. O_o
- CalebArisas (talk) - What is wrong about this article? It is perfectly fine, and is loaded with the information you want. Per all. This article stays featured.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) I really do not see anything seriously wrong here. This article has the quality of a featured article.
- Magikrazy51 (talk) For a character whose only been in two games, a remake and a German comic, it's pretty good.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
DKPetey99
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) It meets all the standards. What can be added to make it better?
- Iggykoopa (talk) yeah i think that it is a really good article considering how little there is to work with
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Here is my simple response: Why do you think it is not quality enough? This article is about as long as it gets!
Comments
He is one character who appeared in one game. I mean I love him, but there is not a lot of information in the article.--DiddyKongfan020899
- He actually appeared in more than one game. But how notable he is does not matter. The article has a great amount of info. It tells you all his abilities, his personality, his appearances, etc. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
@DKPetey: It doesn't have to be as big as the SSBB article to be featured. It's long enough, has everything it needs, and follows all of the standards for a FA. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
- DKPetey: Who are you referring to? I'll add everything necessary to make your vote, er, count. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- Look, here's the template you're supposed to make the "Removal of Support/Oppose Votes" just to clear things up:
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ====
;{{User|Username of vote you want to remove}}
#{{User|Your username}} - Reason on removal
@FF65, yeah just keep it featured! DKPetey99 18:09, 31 March 2011 (EDT)
You should have let the proposal die DX LeftyGreenMario (talk)
