MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Honeyhive Galaxy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Gamefreak75 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (→Fawfulfury65) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Wario removed that template. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Wario removed that template. | ||
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Per all. | #{{User|Gamefreak75}} - Per all. | ||
#{{User|Bowser's luma}} Per Tucayo. | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 16:32, December 12, 2010
Honeyhive Galaxy
Remove Featured Article Status
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) It has a rewrite template now...
Keep Featured Article Status
- Bowser's luma (talk) Since Tucayo fixed the tense and such, it's now fine. Merci boucoup Tucayo (and I leave you speaking French to a Mexican...)
- Tucayo (talk) - Oh yes, I need to vote here XP per BL. Sil vous plait. Wait...
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Oh yes. Merci. PS I can't speak French, and Tucayo, um, don't create passive sentences.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - Sono molto bellissimo ancora.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Fawfulfury65
- Tucayo (talk) - Problems solved
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Wario removed that template.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - Per all.
- Bowser's luma (talk) Per Tucayo.
Comments
Fawfulfury, you're supposed to add a reason for unfeature nominations. If this is a feature nomination, yeah, it's allowed. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Wait, how come this article does not show up on this page under "FAs Proposed for Unfeaturing"? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
65: There is no tense template. Instead, we have a blue one. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I'll fix the demonstratives thing. Tucayo (talk)
It seems as if the verb tense template was changed to a different rewrite template, but still, that's against the rules. Bowser's luma (talk)
All problems have been solved. It was written terribly Tucayo (talk)
