MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Shadow Queen: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (@KS3: You always add this message)
(No difference)

Revision as of 00:18, August 26, 2010

Shadow Queen

Shadow Queen was nominated for unfeaturing 13:34, 16 July 2010 and was unfeatured at 17:23 23 July, 2010. It cannot be renominated for three months

Remove Featured Article Status

  1. Booderdash (talk) There is grammar errors everywhere, the story section is long and overwhelming compared to the powers section, there is a rewrite template on the top, and there is unnesscary trivia.
  2. KS3 (talk) Per Booderdash.
  3. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Not only that, but article is nearly devoid of images.
  4. Marioguy1 (talk) - Well, when I added the {{tense}} tag to the article I told myself (and Edo) that I would nominate it to be unfeatured in a week...that was about a month ago. So, instead, I'll support this one. Per LGM, that's a good point that I missed.
  5. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per all (and I added the Image tag)
  6. Commander Code-8 (talk) Unfeature this immiediatly. We can have FAs that have notice templates.
  7. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - Per all!....except for CC8's second part of his vote.
  8. Mukumukuluma (talk) Some of the picture might scare kids!

Keep Featured Article Status

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Comments

Just so everyone knows, that image-less area in the Background section has no images simply because there can be no images found about it. Her background is never actually seen, it is told by characters in the game. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

We could at least place an image of the Shadow Queen in battle with Mario in the section, "Powers and Abilities." BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
@BLOF: If the article already has an image, try to use {{MoreImages}} instead of {{Image}}, thx! Marioguy1 (talk)
Oops, I get mixed up between the two :P BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)