MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Nintendo GameCube: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[Nintendo GameCube]]===
'''Nintendo Gamecube was nominated for FA at 14:51, April 25, 2010, and failed at 22:07, 20 June 2010.'''
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=14:51, April 25 2010
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|KS3}} A great article with minimal amount of errors and many images.
#{{User|KS3}} A great article with minimal amount of errors and many images.

Revision as of 20:01, July 6, 2010

Nintendo Gamecube was nominated for FA at 14:51, April 25, 2010, and failed at 22:07, 20 June 2010.

Support

  1. KS3 (talk) A great article with minimal amount of errors and many images.
  2. Hatena Kid (talk)

Oppose

  1. Reversinator (talk) Once the GameCube games are actually explained instead of just listed, I'll be happy.
  2. Commander Code-8 (talk) The start is written poorly. Do we really need to know the colors?

Removal of Opposes

Reversinator

  1. KS3 (talk) Wii lists its games and doesn't explain them, yet it is still a FA. This should also apply to the Nintendo GameCube.
  2. 4DJONG (talk) Well, that article is about the console not the games that are played using it. Also it would turn the article into a list of games for the GameCube.

Comments

KS3: You've been lazy. You haven't even placed FASTAT at on the page. Commander Code-8 (talk)

I wasn't lazy, I just forgot. KS3 (talk)

@KS3: Yes, I know Wii doesn't explain the games either (well, none of the console articles do), but it should. It would make the articles a whole lot better. Reversinator (talk)

So, you just want it like how the series has a list of games and their description? BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Everyone says that that doesn't make any sense. KS3 (talk)