MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Smash Bros.

Super Smash Bros.

Remove Featured Article Status

1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) At a first glance, this article is a long article with plenty of pictures. At a closer glance, though, there is a slew of grammar errors (I even corrected a few "you's".) Not only that, but the information on each character/pokeball pokemon/stage are vague one-two liners. (Link is a character with medium weight, strength and speed. He uses his sword to attack.) I didn't know he uses his sword to attack! The stages in single-player mode looks really messy too. The article is not very well organized either. The best of what Mario Wiki has to offer? I've seen better articles.
2. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though Super Smash Bros. is an awesome game with awesome explosion noises and tornadoes, I have to say this is not a very great article. The section Non-playable characters list such characters twice already. And I don't see what's the point of having list of Pokemon in this article when it's already covered in this article (though it's relatively easy to fix). The rest of the reasons I have, LGM covered it.
3. Coincollector (talk) - Agree. Some sections repeat the same info (playable chracters, non-playable, etc...). The reception section needs a hand too.
4. Gamefreak75 (talk) Unfortuantely, I have to agree with everyone.
5. KS3 (talk) Per all.
6. Commander Code-8 (talk) Despite my love for the Smash Bros. series, this just has mess, mess, mess, more mess, and a boring list of pokemon.
7. Luigi=awesome Same as above.

Comments

I nominated the article at 05:25, 7 May 2010. Can someone add that at the top of the page? LeftyGreenMario (talk)

Urgh...BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

BLOF, I wouldn't want to go to another page just to see the pokemon. They are fine here. All they need, though, is expansion and possibly a rewriting. LeftyGreenMario (talk)

I could just easily copy pasta that information from that article with absolutely no effort at all!!!! :( BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)