MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Donkey Kong 64

Donkey Kong 64

Support

1. Raphaelraven497 (talk) This article is very long, detailed, and gives an excellent description of each concept in the game. This article is excellent.

Oppose

1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) The article is long, but all the playable characters' descriptions are way too short. A huge amount of sections are extremely short. In other words, everything I mentioned needs a lot of expansion.
2. Fawfulfury65 (talk) Actually, MILLIONS of things are wrong with this article. That one table that describes the locations of all the Golden Bananas is absolutely horrible (in fact, I think we should get rid of all of it). It has "you's" all over it and is horribly written. You can't even understand what its telling you to do. BTW the article is incomplete. Next, the story section. The game has a long, long story. Every time you beat a level, a new cutscene can be seen. That nasty little paragraph is not enough, and it only explains a little bit of the first cutscene. Well, I can go on and on, but I don't want to fill up this whole page.
3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Ew, one-liners, and TWO templates (expand and rewrite). Per all
4. Reversinator (talk) Horribly written, in great need of extension and HAS TWO IMPROVEMENT TEMPLATES.
5. Commander Code-8 (talk) Are you blind Raphael? This has two bloomin' Improvement templates!!!!
6. KS3 (talk) "This," says Fawfulfury65, "is worse than Donkey Kong Country," which I nominated, and she criticized it. Per all.
7. Mr bones (talk) Construction Template and Rewritting Template?Per Reversinator.

Comments

Commander Code-8: Before flaming, better check first whether the improvement tags were already there when the article was nominated. They weren't. Time Q (talk)

@KS3: Wait what? They're both bad articles. BTW, I'm not a he. Fawfulfury65 (talk)