Talk:X-Naut ship: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--{{User|Knife}} 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST) | If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--{{User|Knife}} 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST) | ||
:Many articles are named with conjectured titles, yet we maintain them. But, considering the shortness of this example, we could probably merge it to either [[Lord Crump]]'s or the [[X-Naut]] page (I favor the latter). [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 18:13, 18 December 2009 (EST) | :Many articles are named with conjectured titles, yet we maintain them. But, considering the shortness of this example, we could probably merge it to either [[Lord Crump]]'s or the [[X-Naut]] page (I favor the latter). [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 18:13, 18 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--{{User|Knife}} 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:27, December 18, 2009
If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--Knife (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Many articles are named with conjectured titles, yet we maintain them. But, considering the shortness of this example, we could probably merge it to either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page (I favor the latter). Redstar 18:13, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--Knife (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST)
