MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
#{{User|Super mario fan}} The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game.
#{{User|Super mario fan}} The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game.
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - The non-gallery part of the article has ''two images''
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - The non-gallery part of the article has ''two images''
#{{user|Fawfulfury65}} There's like no pictures almost! This is too bland!
#{{user|Fawfulfury65}} I've added more images, but there is an incomplete "Sidequests" section that must be complete for this to be a FA.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====

Revision as of 12:23, November 26, 2009

Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga

Support

  1. MATEOELBACAN (talk) This article it's much detailed,and has artwork this must be a FA.
  2. user:Super Luigi! i agree, because this is the first Mario & Luigi RPG game, and it it is a highly detailed article.

Oppose

  1. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) This article needs more images especially in the story section. No one wants to read through text without images.
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) Per BabyLuigiOnFire. As I scroll down the page, I only see blocks of text with a few pictures to back it up.
  3. Baby Mario Bloops (talk) - I said to wait till there were images on the story part! Sorry, but images do count for featuring a article!
  4. Super mario fan (talk) The story section has untrue or weird sections that aren't in the game.
  5. Marioguy1 (talk) - The non-gallery part of the article has two images
  6. Fawfulfury65 (talk) I've added more images, but there is an incomplete "Sidequests" section that must be complete for this to be a FA.

Removal of Opposes

Comments

So you all say that the article lacks on images,huh?...Then I'll add them!--MATEOELBACAN 16:10, 13 November 2009 (EST)

I added some pics in the story section! Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Thanks ^^--MATEOELBACAN 18:07, 24 November 2009 (EST)