Talk:Chocolate Island: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(when in doubt, leave it out) |
m (Removing talk-template) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Do you think I could put Chocolate Island in the desert category? I've always thought it was supposed to be a desert (the ground looks sandy and stuff), but no official sources say it's a desert. {{User:CrystalYoshi/sig}} | Do you think I could put Chocolate Island in the desert category? I've always thought it was supposed to be a desert (the ground looks sandy and stuff), but no official sources say it's a desert. {{User:CrystalYoshi/sig}} | ||
:Hm... I always thought of it as some sort of canyon or mountain range... Guess you can't say that without a doubt... - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 22:06, 20 September 2009 (EDT) | :Hm... I always thought of it as some sort of canyon or mountain range... Guess you can't say that without a doubt... - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 22:06, 20 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
:Well it is possible that it could be a desert, but on the other hand [[Choco Mountain|in some occasions]] it looks like a mountain range or like something completely different. It would be helpful if it were officially called desert somewhere... - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 22:44, 29 September 2009 (EDT) | :Well it is possible that it could be a desert, but on the other hand [[Choco Mountain|in some occasions]] it looks like a mountain range or like something completely different. It would be helpful if it were officially called desert somewhere... - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 22:44, 29 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
::To be technical, deserts are just areas with very little precipitation: they don't necessarily have to be sandy and flat, just dry. However, we shouldn't categorize based on semantics, nor should we rely on individual interpretations of images (personally, I thought the picture made the ground look muddy, not dry). Bottom line is: we have no official proof that it's a desert, ergo we cannot categorize it as one. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 23:40, 29 September 2009 (EDT) | ::To be technical, deserts are just areas with very little precipitation: they don't necessarily have to be sandy and flat, just dry. However, we shouldn't categorize based on semantics, nor should we rely on individual interpretations of images (personally, I thought the picture made the ground look muddy, not dry). Bottom line is: we have no official proof that it's a desert, ergo we cannot categorize it as one. - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 23:40, 29 September 2009 (EDT) | ||
:::Ok, Walkazo summed it up pretty good I guess. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 23:52, 29 September 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 22:52, September 29, 2009
Do you think I could put Chocolate Island in the desert category? I've always thought it was supposed to be a desert (the ground looks sandy and stuff), but no official sources say it's a desert. CrystalYoshi
- Hm... I always thought of it as some sort of canyon or mountain range... Guess you can't say that without a doubt... - Gabumon(talk) 22:06, 20 September 2009 (EDT)
There's actually a piece of official artwork that makes it look like a desert. One second, I'll find it. Here we go... [1] CrystalYoshi
- Well it is possible that it could be a desert, but on the other hand in some occasions it looks like a mountain range or like something completely different. It would be helpful if it were officially called desert somewhere... -
Gabumon(talk) 22:44, 29 September 2009 (EDT)
- To be technical, deserts are just areas with very little precipitation: they don't necessarily have to be sandy and flat, just dry. However, we shouldn't categorize based on semantics, nor should we rely on individual interpretations of images (personally, I thought the picture made the ground look muddy, not dry). Bottom line is: we have no official proof that it's a desert, ergo we cannot categorize it as one. - Walkazo 23:40, 29 September 2009 (EDT)