User talk:Doopliss rocks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Background) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
:I was talking about the backround for my Userpage -''Doopliss rocks'' | :I was talking about the backround for my Userpage -''Doopliss rocks'' | ||
Looks like its working to me. {{User:Timmy Tim/sig}} |
Revision as of 02:05, July 21, 2009
Please RemoveDoopliss Rocks, I would greatly appreciate it if you removed the Featured Article template from your page. You know what, to heck with etiquette; Remove the template now, it is against the rules of your userpage to categorize it as a featured Article. Marioguy1 (talk) My bad. I didn't know that it was illegal -Doopliss rocks
Did you mean the Doopliss Template on my userpage?- Doopliss rocks
Yes, I will vote. But, does that mean that I can put the Doopliss Template back on my userpage - Doopliss rocks
Thanks. And I'm in the process of voting right now. -Doopliss rocks Re:FAQOK, to support an article, here's a billeted list:
Does that clear it up? Marioguy1 (talk) Yeah, I found it.-Doopliss rocks BackgroundHere's the code, <table style="color:black;background:#F66;border:6px solid #030;-moz-border-radius:6px;padding:8px;" width=100%>. I hope you like it, IMMY IM
E.g. If you want red writing saying Hi!, type <font color="red">Hi!</font> and if you did it right, you should get Hi!. That's an easier way than timmy tim's Marioguy1 (talk)
|