MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Galaxy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Removal of Opposes: I meant to delete this a while back)
Line 17: Line 17:


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#Sigh... the only thing is that the enemies section looks awkward with stuff like "little red bug" I guess we just have to make a new article with conjecture names. Oh, and I vaguely also remember a picture in one of the Bowser Galaxies, with an smb sprite. Not the user but the game;) Add that and I will remove my oppose, though supporting it still needs a couple of thoughts.
{{User:Booderdash/sig|not really good}}


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====

Revision as of 10:51, July 10, 2009

Super Mario Galaxy

"Super Mario Galaxy" was nominated for featured article status at 17:58, 1 July 2009 (EDT). If the nomination does not pass by 21:58, 30 August 2009, it will be considered failed.

Support

  1. Super Mario Bros. (talk) Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
  2. McQueenMario (talk) Per Super Mario Bros.
  3. YellowYoshi127 (talk) Yoshi! Yes, it does meet the requirements and yes, it is a great page. (Been on it millions)
  4. This...game...IS SO EPIC!!!Stick2012 15:51, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
  5. I agree, well-written but a couple too many lists for my liking, but still Marioguy1 (talk)
  6. RPGCRAZIEE (talk) This article is just as the game, great! It has very good information.
  7. Gamer2.1 (talk) I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical.
  8. SpriteYoshi (talk)per all

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

Okay, to get more in depth about the qualifications. Super Mario Galaxy is a well written, descriptive, un-biased, and detailed article, going into depth about the game and is not tagged with any improvement tags. It has good quality images, to the extent that a few of them are featured images themselves and a couple of others are/were nominated. It has citations where needed, and the beggining of the article is a good detailed lead that would look good on the Main Page. If I am correct, it has no (and if I'm wrong, very few) redlinks covering the page. It, overall, is a quality article and deserves to be featured. Super Mario Bros. (talk)

  1. This is probably the best article currently nominated for FA right now.SpriteYoshi (talk)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Super_Mario_Galaxy&oldid=591249"