User talk:Super Mario Bros./No-Sig: Difference between revisions
(Thank you!) |
m (→Some changes: my mistake) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
#Users that persist in breaking these signature rules will be dealt with by a Sysop/Bureaucrat. | #Users that persist in breaking these signature rules will be dealt with by a Sysop/Bureaucrat. | ||
Number 9 (" | Number 9 ("7" if you take my previous advice) is fine. | ||
I hope this is useful! - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:07, 29 June 2009 (EDT) | I hope this is useful! - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} 20:07, 29 June 2009 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:57, June 29, 2009
So yeah. Any suggestions can go here on the talkpage. Super Mario Bros. (talk)
Some changes
The current Rules 2 and 3 aren't really rules: 2 is the reason for 1, and 3 is a supplement to 1. I suggest combing them like this:
- Some of the signature codes that are not allowed are ~~~(~) and {{User:User Name Here/sig}}.
- Some of these signatures ruin the counting on voting style pages, particularly signatures with images.
- No signatures are allowed, even if some don't ruin the counting on these specific pages. It wouldn't be fair if some signatures were allowed and others not allowed.
The current 4, 5 and 6 ("2,3 and 4" if you take my advice and combine 1,2 and 3) are all good.
The first part of 7 ("5" is 1,2 and 3 are merged) is good, but the rules stuff is unnecessary, as this page would become a MarioWiki policy page if your proposal passes, and Sysops/Bureaucrats are automatically the only ones allowed to edit MWiki rules on their own. I also rewrote 8:
- Sysops/Bureaucrats hold the right to delete/change any signatures they believe break the above rules within reason.
- Users that persist in breaking these signature rules will be dealt with by a Sysop/Bureaucrat.
Number 9 ("7" if you take my previous advice) is fine.
I hope this is useful! - Walkazo 20:07, 29 June 2009 (EDT)
Thank you!
Yes, Walkazo. Thank you for making your suggestions. I will go ahead and make those changes. Super Mario Bros. (talk)