MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
This page was last active on May 27. In a few days, it will be deleted, but even if just two people have voted (supported) so far? I think this has not been the case before. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 13:52, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | This page was last active on May 27. In a few days, it will be deleted, but even if just two people have voted (supported) so far? I think this has not been the case before. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 13:52, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
:Yeah, the rule says to delete an inactive nomination after 1 month, no matter how many people voted. But actually, you just pushed the deadline back one month by posting your comment. I don't know if this is allowed though... {{User:Time Q/sig}} 14:47, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | :Yeah, the rule says to delete an inactive nomination after 1 month, no matter how many people voted. But actually, you just pushed the deadline back one month by posting your comment. I don't know if this is allowed though... {{User:Time Q/sig}} 14:47, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
::Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | ::Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. Anyway, I don't know how an article can become featured when people just don't vote. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:12, June 22, 2009
WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$!
Support
- Grandy02 (talk): After a heavy expansion, I think the article is fine now. If there are any flaws (including grammar), please let me know.
- Arend (talk): This page includes everything you can tell about the game. It looks good. I like the part about the development.
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
This page was last active on May 27. In a few days, it will be deleted, but even if just two people have voted (supported) so far? I think this has not been the case before. --Grandy02 13:52, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
- Yeah, the rule says to delete an inactive nomination after 1 month, no matter how many people voted. But actually, you just pushed the deadline back one month by posting your comment. I don't know if this is allowed though... Time Questions 14:47, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
- Thanks for answer. However, didn't post to push the deadline. Anyway, I don't know how an article can become featured when people just don't vote. --Grandy02 14:51, 22 June 2009 (EDT)
