Talk:Kazooie: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(response to Time Q) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Sorry to bring this up again, but I still don't see how Kazooie is relevant enough to the ''Mario'' series for a separate article. Let's see, she was first ''"referenced briefly"'' in an instruction booklet. Definitely not article-worthy. Then she made a ''cameo'' appearance in a ''beta'' version of a game. Not article-worthy either. Finally, she appeared in a comic which was so distant from the ''Mario'' series [[Talk:N-Gang|we decided to not make articles about characters only appearing there]]. Thus, I see no reason to keep this article, even if we take all of Kazooie's pseudo-appearances and references together. So, uh, am I missing something, or is this not article-worthy? {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:44, 30 December 2008 (EST) | Sorry to bring this up again, but I still don't see how Kazooie is relevant enough to the ''Mario'' series for a separate article. Let's see, she was first ''"referenced briefly"'' in an instruction booklet. Definitely not article-worthy. Then she made a ''cameo'' appearance in a ''beta'' version of a game. Not article-worthy either. Finally, she appeared in a comic which was so distant from the ''Mario'' series [[Talk:N-Gang|we decided to not make articles about characters only appearing there]]. Thus, I see no reason to keep this article, even if we take all of Kazooie's pseudo-appearances and references together. So, uh, am I missing something, or is this not article-worthy? {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:44, 30 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Time Q, I see exactly what you're saying. Kazooie has barely anything to do with the Mario series, certainly not worthy of an article. Personally, I don't think Banjo Kazooie even deserves an article, but that's just my opinion. Do you think it will require a Proposal to confirm deleting this page? | |||
{{User:Dom/sig}} 06:53, 30 December 2008 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 07:53, December 30, 2008
Uhh... I don't think we should make articles about implied Banjo characters...Knife (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2007 (EDT)
But it was in a Donkey Kong game manual, before Banjo even had a series. -- Sir Godus
Yeah, this is legit....barely. -- Son of Suns
Sorry to bring this up again, but I still don't see how Kazooie is relevant enough to the Mario series for a separate article. Let's see, she was first "referenced briefly" in an instruction booklet. Definitely not article-worthy. Then she made a cameo appearance in a beta version of a game. Not article-worthy either. Finally, she appeared in a comic which was so distant from the Mario series we decided to not make articles about characters only appearing there. Thus, I see no reason to keep this article, even if we take all of Kazooie's pseudo-appearances and references together. So, uh, am I missing something, or is this not article-worthy? Time Questions 06:44, 30 December 2008 (EST)
Time Q, I see exactly what you're saying. Kazooie has barely anything to do with the Mario series, certainly not worthy of an article. Personally, I don't think Banjo Kazooie even deserves an article, but that's just my opinion. Do you think it will require a Proposal to confirm deleting this page?
06:53, 30 December 2008 (EST)
