Talk:Mario Excite Bike: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Especially for games of such an enigmatic nature as this, I've seen Wikipedia members get information wrong various amounts of times. | Especially for games of such an enigmatic nature as this, I've seen Wikipedia members get information wrong various amounts of times. | ||
:You are right, we already discussed not to cite Wikipedia anymore, this reference just hasn't been removed yet. But you should use the site with the release info as a reference rather than linking it within the text. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:07, 12 December 2008 (EST) | :You are right, we already discussed not to cite Wikipedia anymore, this reference just hasn't been removed yet. But you should use the site with the release info as a reference rather than linking it within the text. Another question: Is the title "Mario Excite Bike" official, actually? The article also mentions a Japanese title, and the game has been released in Japan only, so we should use the official title. --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 09:07, 12 December 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 09:09, December 12, 2008
Who is that on the far left in the upper screenshot? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:26, 2 October 2007 (EDT)
It's just Peach Mr. Guy the Guy
Talk!
Well, I can't explain, but it most likely is Mr. Guy the Guy Talk!
On references....
Should we really consider Wikipedia a good "reference" site?
Especially for games of such an enigmatic nature as this, I've seen Wikipedia members get information wrong various amounts of times.
- You are right, we already discussed not to cite Wikipedia anymore, this reference just hasn't been removed yet. But you should use the site with the release info as a reference rather than linking it within the text. Another question: Is the title "Mario Excite Bike" official, actually? The article also mentions a Japanese title, and the game has been released in Japan only, so we should use the official title. --Grandy02 09:07, 12 December 2008 (EST)
