Talk:Dragon Wario (Wario Land: Super Mario Land 3): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Son of Suns (talk | contribs) (→Fire Creatures: omg soooooo tired) |
Super-Yoshi (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should Dragon Wario be included in the Dragon Category and Template? - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} | Should Dragon Wario be included in the Dragon Category and Template? - {{User:Walkazo/sig}} | ||
::No, because it's a form of Wario, not an actual dragonn {{User:Goomb-omb/sig}} | ::No, because it's a form of Wario, not an actual dragonn {{User:Goomb-omb/sig}} | ||
:::Id like to counter that. The [[Template:Ice|Ice Template]] has Ice Mario and Ice Luigi in it. Why can't the Dragon template have Dragon Wario then? {{User:Super-Yoshi/sig}} | |||
== Fire Creatures == | == Fire Creatures == | ||
| Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
:The fire template seems pretty pointless. Does anyone actually use it to navigate through "fire" articles? Is it even helpful? -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | :The fire template seems pretty pointless. Does anyone actually use it to navigate through "fire" articles? Is it even helpful? -- {{User|Son of Suns}} | ||
::No not really. Many fire creatures have appeared in the Mario series, and it would also make some templates like the Ice and Dragon templates kinda awkward if we consider that. Think about it..."Does anyone need to navigate through Dragon articles?" IMO, the more templates an article has, the better it is. {{User:Super-Yoshi/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 22:35, December 1, 2008
Should Dragon Wario be included in the Dragon Category and Template? - Walkazo
- No, because it's a form of Wario, not an actual dragonn
Goomb-omb
- Id like to counter that. The Ice Template has Ice Mario and Ice Luigi in it. Why can't the Dragon template have Dragon Wario then? uper-Yoshi
- Id like to counter that. The Ice Template has Ice Mario and Ice Luigi in it. Why can't the Dragon template have Dragon Wario then? uper-Yoshi
- No, because it's a form of Wario, not an actual dragonn
Fire Creatures
Wario isn't really a creature, so could I remove him from this template?
Goomb-omb 14:31, 1 December 2008 (EST)
- No, the Fire Template shows everything that is associated with fire, including Wario. As for "creature", my dictionary's definition is "anything created, especially a living being" which means Wario is a creature. We went with the name "creature" because of this universality: it covers characters (i.e. Wario), species (animals and plants) and things that are neither (like ghosts, and half the things on the template). - Walkazo 22:24, 1 December 2008 (EST)
- The fire template seems pretty pointless. Does anyone actually use it to navigate through "fire" articles? Is it even helpful? -- Son of Suns (talk)
- No not really. Many fire creatures have appeared in the Mario series, and it would also make some templates like the Ice and Dragon templates kinda awkward if we consider that. Think about it..."Does anyone need to navigate through Dragon articles?" IMO, the more templates an article has, the better it is. uper-Yoshi
- No not really. Many fire creatures have appeared in the Mario series, and it would also make some templates like the Ice and Dragon templates kinda awkward if we consider that. Think about it..."Does anyone need to navigate through Dragon articles?" IMO, the more templates an article has, the better it is. uper-Yoshi
