Talk:Nathaniel's Fun Factory: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (→Oppose factory) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
===Oppose factory=== | ===Oppose factory=== | ||
#{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} I could maybe support an article for Nathaniel himself on the grounds of him directly interacting with DK on page 5, but this | #{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} I could maybe support just an article for Nathaniel himself on the grounds of him directly interacting with DK on page 5, but this feels too much like a mutual Nintendo crossover for me to be comfortable with giving full coverage to the story. | ||
===Comments factory=== | ===Comments factory=== |
Revision as of 00:01, March 30, 2025
Decide whether this gets full coverage
![]() |
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Saturday, April 5, 2025, 11:11 GMT
While Super Mario characters are not the main focus of this book, counting the cover page, they appear on five out of the eight pages in this book/pamphlet-hybrid (meaning 62.5% of the book features a Super Mario character somewhere). The book/pamphlet features unique art for Mario, Yoshi, Princess Peach, and Donkey Kong, in addition to occasionally providing descriptions of said characters (i.e. "And that night, his dream showed him a powerful, happy, fun-loving gorilla who led Nathaniel to wondrous places…", " Nathaniel imagined a funny little plumber with a dinosaur friend…"). Because of all of this, I think this book should get full or nearly-full coverage, resulting in pages for Nathaniel, the Fun Factory, Nathaniel's house, etcetera.
Proposer: Nelsonic (talk)
Deadline: April 12, 2025, 23:59 GMT
Support factory
- Nelsonic (talk) Per proposal factory.
- Rykitu (talk) 4 out of the 6 Nintendo characters featured here are Mario characters. That's 66% Mario. Which is more than Smash Bros and Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games. The latter of which I'm pretty sure we give full coverage to. I also predicted this proposal lol.
Oppose factory
- SolemnStormcloud (talk) I could maybe support just an article for Nathaniel himself on the grounds of him directly interacting with DK on page 5, but this feels too much like a mutual Nintendo crossover for me to be comfortable with giving full coverage to the story.
Comments factory
What would full coverage mean in this case? Would we just expand this article, or would we like, give Nathaniel a page or something? The former feels like such a free action we're not even sure it would warrant a proposal, honestly. ~Camwoodstock ( talk • contribs )
14:02, March 29, 2025 (EDT)
- @Camwoodstock I had meant creating pages for the characters in the story (i.e. Nathaniel) and prominent items (i.e. the Fun Factory). Nelsonic (talk) 15:04, March 29, 2025 (EDT)
- could be worth specifying in the proposal itself —
eviemaybe (talk / contributions) 18:52, March 29, 2025 (EDT)
- could be worth specifying in the proposal itself —
- @EvieMaybe Sounds good. I'll modify the proposal accordingly.
I think the princess on page 6 is actually supposed to be Zelda and not Peach based on her being grouped with Link in the illustration and description ("and an elf trying to rescue a princess in distress"). The numerous Pokémon cameos on pages 1 (Bulbasaur, Jigglypuff, Meowth, Dewgong(?), Poliwhirl, Charizard, and Eevee) and 4 (Pidgeot, Jigglypuff again(?), Flareon, Bulbasaur again, Blastoise(?), Charizard again, and Beedrill) further skew the ratio away from Super Mario, but I can justify not counting them since they're rather minor. — SolemnStormcloud (talk) 23:58, March 29, 2025 (EDT)