Talk:Game Boy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(33 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Add ons==
==Add ons==
Should I add the stuff about the game boy printer, camera, ect.? (note to self: game boy printer featured in comic {{fakelink|Das Phantom der Piste}})<br>{{user:theused/sig}}
Should I add the stuff about the game boy printer, camera, ect.? (note to self: game boy printer featured in comic {{fake link|Das Phantom der Piste}})<br>{{user:theused/sig}}
:...which hasn't enough significance to the Mario Wiki, [[Talk:N Gang|in my opinion]]. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 07:50, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
:...which hasn't enough significance to the Mario Wiki, [[Talk:N Gang|in my opinion]]. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 07:50, 18 May 2008 (EDT)


Line 6: Line 6:
::::The Gameboy Color Is a seperat system. It already has a link, but it doesent need a section. [[User:Conconcon5|Conconcon5]] 16:11, 1 January 2012 (EST)
::::The Gameboy Color Is a seperat system. It already has a link, but it doesent need a section. [[User:Conconcon5|Conconcon5]] 16:11, 1 January 2012 (EST)


== Move 'em out! ==
The Lego + Game Boy Collaboration should be addded to "Appearances in the Super Mario franchise" section under Miscellaneous. [[User:TheRealL64|TheRealL64]] ([[User talk:TheRealL64|talk]]) 05:46, January 13, 2025 (EST)


===Separate Game Boy Pocket and Game Boy Light sections from the Game Boy article===
== Split [[GB]] ==
The Game Boy Pocket and the Game Boy Light are successors of the original Game Boy itself, so I wonder why both consoles are merged as sections in the Game Boy article itself. They're separate systems, just like the Game Boy Color. I think these sections should get separated and become articles.


'''Proposer''': {{User|Danimario9}}<br>
{{TPP}}
'''Deadline''': Febraury 19, 2012, 23:59 GMT
{{early notice|option=yes|March 21, 2025}}
Okay, first of, what is GB? Or should I say, who is GB? It's a bit unclear. Anyways, GB, known in Japanese as GB-kun, is an enormous Game Boy seen in 9-Volt's room in ''WarioWare, inc: Mega Microgame$''. It's capable of speech (if "OK" counts as speech), has a robotic arm it uses to insert cartridges into itself?, and, again, is very large. Not only is it clearly not a normal Game Boy, but it's also anthropomorphized by the ''-kun'' honorific (compare Diskun) and ability to talk(?). Whatever this thing is, it should surely be split.


====Support====
'''Proposer''': {{User|Blinker}}<br>
#{{User|Danimario9}} - I think they're better as articles and not as sections.
'''Deadline''': March 28, 2025, 23:59 GMT


====Oppose====
===Support: split GB===
#{{User|Blinker}} Per proposal. By the way, I'm always a bit confused about the identifier rules. Should this be {{fake link|GB (character)}} or would {{fake link|GB}} suffice?
#{{User|Pseudo}} Seems like this is a distinct character who ''is'' a Game Boy, rather than an ordinary example of a Game Boy. Per proposal.
#{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Per Blinker.
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} Per proposal. In regards to Blinker, we assume it would be {{fake link|GB (character)}}, since [[GB]] is an abbreviation redirect for the Game Boy itself.
#{{User|Hewer}} {{color|green|OK}}
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} Per all.
#{{User|Rykitu}} Per all.
#{{User|Pizza Master}} Per all.


====Comments====
===Oppose: do not split GB===
 
===Comments (GB?)===
By "GB-kun", do you mean the one on the left in this image? <br>[[File:9-Volt prologue WarioWare Mega Microgames.png]]<br> {{User:Camwoodstock/sig}} 18:18, March 14, 2025 (EDT)
:Yes. <small>Well, technically "GB" is just a name in the cast roll but it's fairly obvious that that's what it's referring to, I think.</small> [[User:Blinker|Blinker]] ([[User talk:Blinker|talk]]) 18:24, March 14, 2025 (EDT)
::On identifiers: I've seen both, but usually a well-placed "about" template does the job. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 11:00, March 15, 2025 (EDT)
:::I think it makes more sense to have "GB" redirect to the Game Boy article, and have GB-kun receive the character identifier. Both are Game Boys, and I assume people will look for the system itself when searching for GB, rather than the rather semi-obscure character that is also a Game Boy. It's like how "Peach" redirects to [[Princess Peach]], and [[Peach (fruit)|the fruit itself]] has the fruit identifier. {{User:Arend/sig}} 11:16, March 15, 2025 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:07, March 17, 2025

Add ons

Should I add the stuff about the game boy printer, camera, ect.? (note to self: game boy printer featured in comic Das Phantom der Piste)
Δ ΔTheuseD.PNGΔ Δ

...which hasn't enough significance to the Mario Wiki, in my opinion. Time Questions 07:50, 18 May 2008 (EDT)

How come we don't have the Game Boy Color. -Nerdy Guy

The Gameboy Color Is a seperat system. It already has a link, but it doesent need a section. Conconcon5 16:11, 1 January 2012 (EST)

The Lego + Game Boy Collaboration should be addded to "Appearances in the Super Mario franchise" section under Miscellaneous. TheRealL64 (talk) 05:46, January 13, 2025 (EST)

Split GB

A Yellow Block from Super Mario World This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, March 27, 2025, 00:16 GMT

Based on the vote so far, this option may be eligible to close one week early. Please use {{proposal check|early=yes}} on March 21, 2025 at 23:59 GMT and close the option if applicable.

Okay, first of, what is GB? Or should I say, who is GB? It's a bit unclear. Anyways, GB, known in Japanese as GB-kun, is an enormous Game Boy seen in 9-Volt's room in WarioWare, inc: Mega Microgame$. It's capable of speech (if "OK" counts as speech), has a robotic arm it uses to insert cartridges into itself?, and, again, is very large. Not only is it clearly not a normal Game Boy, but it's also anthropomorphized by the -kun honorific (compare Diskun) and ability to talk(?). Whatever this thing is, it should surely be split.

Proposer: Blinker (talk)
Deadline: March 28, 2025, 23:59 GMT

Support: split GB

  1. Blinker (talk) Per proposal. By the way, I'm always a bit confused about the identifier rules. Should this be GB (character) or would GB suffice?
  2. Pseudo (talk) Seems like this is a distinct character who is a Game Boy, rather than an ordinary example of a Game Boy. Per proposal.
  3. Super Mario RPG (talk) Per Blinker.
  4. Camwoodstock (talk) Per proposal. In regards to Blinker, we assume it would be GB (character), since GB is an abbreviation redirect for the Game Boy itself.
  5. Hewer (talk) OK
  6. ThePowerPlayer (talk) Per all.
  7. Rykitu (talk) Per all.
  8. Pizza Master (talk) Per all.

Oppose: do not split GB

Comments (GB?)

By "GB-kun", do you mean the one on the left in this image?
Scene from the prologue of 9-Volt: 9-Volt enjoys his Nintendo collection and his mixing console at home.
Camwoodstock-sigicon.png~Camwoodstock ( talkcontribs ) Camwoodstock-sigicon2.png 18:18, March 14, 2025 (EDT)

Yes. Well, technically "GB" is just a name in the cast roll but it's fairly obvious that that's what it's referring to, I think. Blinker (talk) 18:24, March 14, 2025 (EDT)
On identifiers: I've seen both, but usually a well-placed "about" template does the job. LinkTheLefty (talk) 11:00, March 15, 2025 (EDT)
I think it makes more sense to have "GB" redirect to the Game Boy article, and have GB-kun receive the character identifier. Both are Game Boys, and I assume people will look for the system itself when searching for GB, rather than the rather semi-obscure character that is also a Game Boy. It's like how "Peach" redirects to Princess Peach, and the fruit itself has the fruit identifier. ArendLogoTransparent.pngrend (talk) (edits) 11:16, March 15, 2025 (EDT)