MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 23: Line 23:
:You may want to oppose the nomination, since it has met FA requirements. If not opposed, it will be featured on October 18. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 02:06, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
:You may want to oppose the nomination, since it has met FA requirements. If not opposed, it will be featured on October 18. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 02:06, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
::I'm not gonna oppose. But my major edit will be done after October 18th (I'm busy), and then I will personally approve of the article's quality. {{User:Dom/sig}}
::I'm not gonna oppose. But my major edit will be done after October 18th (I'm busy), and then I will personally approve of the article's quality. {{User:Dom/sig}}
:::Actually it would be best if you did oppose. 'cause otherwise the article is gonna be featured when it's not actually fine yet. (I didn't read it, so I cannot say anything about its quality) {{User:Time Q/sig}} 09:56, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 09:56, October 15, 2008

Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Support

  1. Marcelagus (TCE) - It's a long article, so I tried my best to find POV and other grammatical mistakes, and as I see it, it looks great. (And it does pass the 4,000 Characters rule)
  2. MisterJaffffeyPeteyPiranhaBanana.gif G0 Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki.
  3. Storm Warrior - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long.
  4. user:tanokki [1]F ThatsMamaLum fb9046e.gif A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy.
  5. Luigi001 (talk) It's ideal for an FA, so per all!

Oppose

Comments

  1. I must say I'm very apprehensive about this one. Skimming through it, the Gameplay section needs work, as does a lot of the SSE Story section. The tables, especially for the stages, need work.

I guess this is a bit of a de facto oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.Phoenix Rider 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

I won't agree to this being featured until I've done a certain major edit. After that, it will be fine as a FA, I guess.th_DimentioSigLeft.png Dom »» McTalk th_SMKDimentiobyStooben.png

You may want to oppose the nomination, since it has met FA requirements. If not opposed, it will be featured on October 18. Time Questions 02:06, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
I'm not gonna oppose. But my major edit will be done after October 18th (I'm busy), and then I will personally approve of the article's quality. th_DimentioSigLeft.png Dom »» McTalk th_SMKDimentiobyStooben.png
Actually it would be best if you did oppose. 'cause otherwise the article is gonna be featured when it's not actually fine yet. (I didn't read it, so I cannot say anything about its quality) Time Questions 09:56, 15 October 2008 (EDT)