MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User:Magitroopa/sig}} - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long. | #{{User:Magitroopa/sig}} - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long. | ||
#{{user:tanokki/sig}} A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy. | #{{user:tanokki/sig}} A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy. | ||
#{{user|Luigi001}} It's ideal for an FA, so per all! | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== |
Revision as of 09:42, October 11, 2008
Super Smash Bros. Brawl
Support
- Marcelagus (T • C • E) - It's a long article, so I tried my best to find POV and other grammatical mistakes, and as I see it, it looks great. (And it does pass the 4,000 Characters rule)
- MisterJaffffey
G0 Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki.
- Storm Warrior - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long.
- user:tanokki [1]
A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy.
- Luigi001 (talk) It's ideal for an FA, so per all!
Oppose
Comments
- I must say I'm very apprehensive about this one. Skimming through it, the Gameplay section needs work, as does a lot of the SSE Story section. The tables, especially for the stages, need work.
I guess this is a bit of a de facto oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.Phoenix Rider 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT)