User talk:Time Q/Unfeature: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::Well, you've certainly put a lot of effort into this. ;) About the template – perhaps it could be titled {{fakelink|Template:UNFSTAT}}, or {{fakelink|Template:Unfeature}}. I'd aslo suggest to make the template different-colored to avoid confusion, (ex: rather than <font color=gold>gold</font> and black, use <font color=lightgray>light gray</font> and black). When you decide what you believe is best, I'd be more than happy to make the template. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 11:08, 20 September 2008 (EDT) | ::Well, you've certainly put a lot of effort into this. ;) About the template – perhaps it could be titled {{fakelink|Template:UNFSTAT}}, or {{fakelink|Template:Unfeature}}. I'd aslo suggest to make the template different-colored to avoid confusion, (ex: rather than <font color=gold>gold</font> and black, use <font color=lightgray>light gray</font> and black). When you decide what you believe is best, I'd be more than happy to make the template. {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 11:08, 20 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
:::That would be awesome if you could make the template. Your color suggestion also sounds good - it shouldn't be too colorful, after all the FA status of an article is at risk, which is a sad thing ;) If Wayo could take charge of the more formal templates, that would be great too. Thanks! {{User:Time Q/sig}} 15:46, 21 September 2008 (EDT) | :::That would be awesome if you could make the template. Your color suggestion also sounds good - it shouldn't be too colorful, after all the FA status of an article is at risk, which is a sad thing ;) If Wayo could take charge of the more formal templates, that would be great too. Thanks! {{User:Time Q/sig}} 15:46, 21 September 2008 (EDT) | ||
::::Alright, glad to hear you liked the color-scheme idea. I've made three examples: [[User:Stooben Rooben/Test/Trial|example I]], [[User:Stooben Rooben/Test|example II]], and [[User:Stooben Rooben/Proposal Example|example III]]. Which one do you think is best? {{User:Stooben Rooben/sig}} 16:14, 21 September 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:14, September 21, 2008
To make the DPL work, we'll need to make a new category and possibly a new template (not FANOMSTAT, but similar too). Let me know if you need help with the specifics. Wa 
TC@Y 10:20, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
- Yup, this is only a first version without changing anything on parameters, templates and stuff. I planned to put this draft on Featured Articles talk first before doing the technical stuff. It'd be great if you could help with me this, that is making templates (we'd need a template similar to {{FASTAT}} too; I suck at making templates...) etc. Thanks! Time Questions 10:32, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well, you've certainly put a lot of effort into this. ;) About the template – perhaps it could be titled Template:Fakelink, or Template:Fakelink. I'd aslo suggest to make the template different-colored to avoid confusion, (ex: rather than gold and black, use light gray and black). When you decide what you believe is best, I'd be more than happy to make the template. — Stooben Rooben 11:08, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
- That would be awesome if you could make the template. Your color suggestion also sounds good - it shouldn't be too colorful, after all the FA status of an article is at risk, which is a sad thing ;) If Wayo could take charge of the more formal templates, that would be great too. Thanks! Time Questions 15:46, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
- Alright, glad to hear you liked the color-scheme idea. I've made three examples: example I, example II, and example III. Which one do you think is best? — Stooben Rooben 16:14, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
- That would be awesome if you could make the template. Your color suggestion also sounds good - it shouldn't be too colorful, after all the FA status of an article is at risk, which is a sad thing ;) If Wayo could take charge of the more formal templates, that would be great too. Thanks! Time Questions 15:46, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
- Well, you've certainly put a lot of effort into this. ;) About the template – perhaps it could be titled Template:Fakelink, or Template:Fakelink. I'd aslo suggest to make the template different-colored to avoid confusion, (ex: rather than gold and black, use light gray and black). When you decide what you believe is best, I'd be more than happy to make the template. — Stooben Rooben 11:08, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
