MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Equipment: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Power Flotzo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[Equipment]]=== | ===[[Equipment]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=02:40, October 22, 2024 (EDT) | |nominated=02:40, October 22, 2024 (EDT) | ||
| | |lastedit=06:40, 21 December 2024 | ||
|nosupport=false | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|RickTommy}} 1) Unlike most other ''Smash''-related articles, it still includes non-''Mario''-related stuff. 2) ''SSB4'' hasn't been at the front of peoples' minds since ''Ultimate'' was released (and is — I'm not making this up — possibly the game to which this most applies). | #{{User|RickTommy}} 1) Unlike most other ''Smash''-related articles, it still includes non-''Mario''-related stuff. 2) ''SSB4'' hasn't been at the front of peoples' minds since ''Ultimate'' was released (and is — I'm not making this up — possibly the game to which this most applies). | ||
| Line 11: | Line 13: | ||
#{{User|Sparks}} Per my comment below. I also want to say that it doesn't matter if a game is forgotten or bad; it's about the quality of the article itself. | #{{User|Sparks}} Per my comment below. I also want to say that it doesn't matter if a game is forgotten or bad; it's about the quality of the article itself. | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} Per Sparks.Crossover content or game relevancy should not impact if an article can, can't, should or shouldn't be featured. If the article itself is still a good quality article, it can stay featured. | #{{User|Tails777}} Per Sparks.Crossover content or game relevancy should not impact if an article can, can't, should or shouldn't be featured. If the article itself is still a good quality article, it can stay featured. | ||
#{{User|Power Flotzo}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Hewer}} The article's quality is what determines whether it should get featured. The arguments for unfeaturing have nothing to do with the article's quality. | |||
#{{User|Killer Moth}} Per all. | |||
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ==== Removal of support/oppose votes ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 15:45, December 22, 2024
Equipment[edit]
Remove featured article status[edit]
- RickTommy (talk) 1) Unlike most other Smash-related articles, it still includes non-Mario-related stuff. 2) SSB4 hasn't been at the front of peoples' minds since Ultimate was released (and is — I'm not making this up — possibly the game to which this most applies).
Keep featured article status[edit]
- Sparks (talk) Per my comment below. I also want to say that it doesn't matter if a game is forgotten or bad; it's about the quality of the article itself.
- Tails777 (talk) Per Sparks.Crossover content or game relevancy should not impact if an article can, can't, should or shouldn't be featured. If the article itself is still a good quality article, it can stay featured.
- Power Flotzo (talk) Per all.
- Hewer (talk) The article's quality is what determines whether it should get featured. The arguments for unfeaturing have nothing to do with the article's quality.
- Killer Moth (talk) Per all.
Removal of support/oppose votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
I'm not going to vote at the moment, but I don't think the article should be unfeatured just because of having too much non-Mario coverage. Glancing at the article, I think it looks neat and detailed. 
Sparks (talk) 
