Talk:Cascading Stone

Official name? RAP... Does it mean you can throw it? :P

Not really.Knife (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2007 (EST)

Merge Cascading Stone, vanishing platform, and moon platform with Falling Platform

This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, December 19, 2024, 18:43 GMT

I was going to make a unilateral move, but as this impacts several articles, a proposal would be more appropriate. I would like to consolidate the Cascading Stone, moon platform, and vanishing platform pages together into one. A preview is available here.

Browsing the Falling Platform article should convey what this object is, and that it is nearly identical to the recurring Cascading Stones from the Yoshi franchise in both design, mechanics, and form. The only outlier is that the Falling Platforms in Super Mario Odyssey are made of rusted metal, but I think this is outweighed by all of the mechanical and spatial similarities. Additionally, it does not seem like the platform's identity as a rock is very important or an defining trait, as the Japanese word "rock" has only been incorporated into the subject's name once, in Yoshi's Island DS, and never again. In addition, it seems like both subjects have gone by a series or very similar names throughout history (as apparent in the preview I link to above in my sandbox), which is not dissimilar to to the names of Donut Blocks, Flatbed Ferries, Note Blocks, Jet Pipes and many other recurring objects in the Mario franchise. So I view the similarities in nomenclature to be further indication that these objects are one in the same. This is not the first time a object from Yoshi's Island has leapt into the mainline games, as is the case with Wobble Rocks.

Originally, my proposal only sought to merge the Cascading Stones and Falling Platform articles. However, there are a couple of over objects that think can reasonably be viewed as identical: namely the vanishing platforms and moon platforms from Super Mario Odyssey. A critical examination of the various kingdoms in Super Mario Odyssey reveals that most kingdoms support the same object or type of object with different designs to match the intended topography, but this does not make them ontologically different objects. This is apparent with a close comparision between many objects in the game, such as flowers, small animals, seesaws (note Timer Challenge vs. sub-area), Brick Blocks (note Wooded Kingdom vs. most other appearances), and so on. So while these objects do not look like rusted panels, I don't think that matters as much as the fact that they are mechanically identical. Objects during Timer Challenges, so as the mentioned vanishing platforms, tend to have vibrant toy-like appearances, and the moon platforms are nearly identical to the giant cube-shaped Falling Platforms from Super Mario 3D Land. The "vanishing platforms" and "moon platforms" are not signaled out as unique objects in any literature available to me other than the Prima Games guidebook, including The Art of Super Mario Odyssey.

I offer three options:

1. Support: Move them all: Cascading Stones, vanishing platforms, and moon platforms would be moved to the Falling Platform article, the same way it looks in my preview.
2. Support: Only move Cascading Stone: The Super Mario Odyssey objects would not be touched.
3. Support: Only move vanishing platform and moon platform to Falling Platform: Cascading Stone would not be touched.
4. Opppose: Keep them all split from one another

Proposer: Nintendo101 (talk)
Deadline: Dec. 28th, 2024, 23:59 GMT

Support: Move them all!

1. Nintendo101 (talk) Per proposal.
2. Rykitu (talk) Per Nintendo101.
3. Super Mario RPG (talk) Per proposer.

Support: Only move vanishing platform and moon platform

1. Arend (talk) I feel we should leave the Cascading Stone out of this. Not only are its Japanese names very different (with only the SM2YI one being slightly similar to the Japanese name of specifically the SM3DL one (which also happens to be the only one of the other falling platforms made of stone)), but Yoshi's Island also features sections such as this one where Cascading Stones will drop down automatically and Yoshi has to climb upon the dropped stones without getting crushed. The stones in these sections do not require being stepped on by the player character to fall down, and as far as I know, none of these other falling platforms have a auto-dropping variant like that. Also, as far as I know, none of these other falling platforms stay put when dropping to the ground (in fact, most of them crumble into disappearance, or vanish in a puff of smoke). In addition, Cascading Stones frequently appear in varying rectangular shapes and sizes, whereas each of the other platforms mentioned have a more consistent size and shape. Moreover, the Cascading Stone article also seems to cover a variant in Yoshi's Island DS called Slide Block, that uh, doesn't actually fall down, as can be seen here.
2. Nintendo101 (talk) Secondary option, per Arend.

Oppose: Keep them split

1. Axii (talk) Per my reasoning in the comments. If some platforms were to be merged, this is not the right way to do it.
2. Hewer (talk) Per Axii, I think this proposal's reasoning is too reliant on shared functions alone. Different objects can have the same functions, such as the excluded Donut Block.
3. Arend (talk) Secondary choice, per Axii, on top of my reasoning to leave the Cascading Stones out of this.

#Rykitu (talk) Each are different enough from one another.

Comments on the Falling Platform proposal

@Rykitu what do you think of the information I laid out in the proposal? - Nintendo101 (talk) 17:24, December 14, 2024 (EST)

@Nintendo101 Sorry about that! Often times I don't read the full proposal and just read enough info for me to understand the full thing unless there's a TL:DR section at the bottom. I thought you were referring to Donut blocks. And when I think of the Cascading Stones from Yoshi's Island, I think of ones that fall from the sky that aren't triggered by the player, which isn't the case for the Donut blocks. I had no idea a falling platform page even existed until now. So can I delete my vote and support or am I supposed to cross it out? Rykitu (talk)

No worries :) Yes, you are supposed to cross-out your current vote and just write in a new one for the option you like. In case you you do not know how to do that, you put <s> and </s> around your current vote. The result looks like this this: #Rykitu (talk) Each are different enough from one another.. Hope that helps! - Nintendo101 (talk) 18:57, December 14, 2024 (EST)

The fact that these platforms have a similar functionality should not be a deciding factor. We should always question if these platforms are different objects first and foremost. Axii (talk) 09:05, December 18, 2024 (EST)

Yes, I agree. I do not think these are different objects (or at least the ones from Super Mario Odyssey). - Nintendo101 (talk) 11:09, December 18, 2024 (EST)

Vanishing platform only appears when a scarecrow is active. Moon platform can be activated by falling rocks, not just the Bowser capture. Axii (talk) 11:45, December 18, 2024 (EST)

Seesaw lifts also appear in Timer Challenges and levels themselves, and I do not see this as a dissimilar scenario. To me, the Luncheon Kingdom platforms are just Falling Platforms with different proportions, which is already the case in the levels themselves. In the Wooded Kingdom, the platforms are narrow, whereas the ones in the Metro Kingdom are wide. As for the moon platforms, I do not really see the fact that boulders can cause them to fall to be a meaningful enough distinction between them and the other Falling Platforms in the game. iirc, we do not really see any context where other objects collide with Falling Platforms in other parts of the game. And even if we did, I don't think that would outweigh their similarities, especially considering large cubed Falling Platforms also appear in the final stretch of Super Mario 3D Land. - Nintendo101 (talk) 12:04, December 18, 2024 (EST)

The difference with collapsing platforms is that they're referred to the same way by the Prima guide (as inconsistent as Prima is, its name is shared). For other platforms, I do not believe function alone is enough. Sure, their behavior is pretty much identical, but it's very clear that these platforms are different. Covering them on the same page would just lead to one big pile of random objects that have a similar functionality. Axii (talk) 12:59, December 18, 2024 (EST)

In your personal view, should the platforms from Super Mario 3D Land and Super Mario Odyssey not share an article because one is stone and one is metal? - Nintendo101 (talk) 13:03, December 18, 2024 (EST)

From what it seems, they are different objects used in different contexts and different appearance with no links to each other. I would say they should stay separate. Axii (talk) 14:19, December 18, 2024 (EST)

Interesting. When I played Odyssey, I immediately recognized them as the same platforms from 3D Land, and this even seems to be attested in their most recurring proportions, how they fall, the speed with which they fall, how they are arranged in levels, their similar Japanese names, and the fact that 3D Land and Odyssey share much of the same staff. I feel like I have been provided every reason to substantiate the view that they are the same object. Our positions seem analogous to lumpers and splitters. - Nintendo101 (talk) 21:13, December 18, 2024 (EST)

@Arend: There are moon platforms in the last bit of the escape sequence in Odyssey that fall on their own without being stepped on. Hewer (talk · contributions · edit count) 12:37, December 18, 2024 (EST)