User talk:Sdman213: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Apologies if this is against policy, but the tone of this message did not feel like it was being productive.) Tag: Manual revert |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Hello! I saw you recently reverted my icons back to their un-transparent versions and I was curious what was wrong with them? They were perfectly transparent and I don’t understand the issue with them. Thanks. {{Unsigned|DavidGamesYT}} | Hello! I saw you recently reverted my icons back to their un-transparent versions and I was curious what was wrong with them? They were perfectly transparent and I don’t understand the issue with them. Thanks. {{Unsigned|DavidGamesYT}} | ||
== Question == | |||
Hey! I saw that you just reverted my edit in [[Sparkle]] because of speculative wording. I don't want to edit war, and I completely understand where I went wrong. I still want to include the information, as I feel it is important. Do you have any better ideas on how I could word it? Thanks for your help! -- {{User:FanOfRosalina2007/sig}} 17:56, September 15, 2024 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:36, November 19, 2024
How he was there then[edit]
tell me how i'm curious :D LetsPlayNintendoITA 22:03, June 12, 2024 (EDT)
Special:Diff/4254224[edit]
What is the "IMO" for, if the writing being unprofessional is an objective fact? --
FanOfYoshi 01:56, June 17, 2024 (EDT)
- Maybe the sexualization of a fictional character that has nothing to do with games or anything and has no place in a wiki? LetsPlayNintendoITA 02:07, June 17, 2024 (EDT)
- That's not what i said at all. What i was saying is that the writing being unprofessional is an objective fact. I'm very well aware that the writing was out of place, which is exactly my point. --
FanOfYoshi 02:10, June 17, 2024 (EDT)
- That's not the proper use of "objective", anyway. "Unprofessional", "creepy" and "inappropriate" are qualitative value judgement, though most people editing the wiki will agree on those terms (same goes for saying Kirby is cute, Wario is rude, Mario is short, etc). Objective would concern more directly quantifiable and observed terms (Kirby is spherical, Wario drives over speed limit, Mario is shorter than Peach).
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 02:19, June 17, 2024 (EDT)
- That's not the proper use of "objective", anyway. "Unprofessional", "creepy" and "inappropriate" are qualitative value judgement, though most people editing the wiki will agree on those terms (same goes for saying Kirby is cute, Wario is rude, Mario is short, etc). Objective would concern more directly quantifiable and observed terms (Kirby is spherical, Wario drives over speed limit, Mario is shorter than Peach).
- That's not what i said at all. What i was saying is that the writing being unprofessional is an objective fact. I'm very well aware that the writing was out of place, which is exactly my point. --
Reverting Mario Party Icons[edit]
Hello! I saw you recently reverted my icons back to their un-transparent versions and I was curious what was wrong with them? They were perfectly transparent and I don’t understand the issue with them. Thanks.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by DavidGamesYT (talk).
Question[edit]
Hey! I saw that you just reverted my edit in Sparkle because of speculative wording. I don't want to edit war, and I completely understand where I went wrong. I still want to include the information, as I feel it is important. Do you have any better ideas on how I could word it? Thanks for your help! -- 
FanOfRosalina2007
(talk · edits) 17:56, September 15, 2024 (EDT)
