Template talk:Ref needed: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-refneeded +ref needed)) |
m (Text replacement - "{{tem|release}}" to "{{tem|flag list}}") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== released == | == released == | ||
When putting this template into a {{tem| | When putting this template into a {{tem|flag list}} template, it screws the released one up. Is there a possible fix for that? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 09:16, 4 June 2009 (EDT) | ||
== Nomenclature == | == Nomenclature == | ||
Considering that we used to have {{tem|fact}}, why are we using this one rather than the more widely-used {{tem|fact}} template? Besides, the name goes against the content ({{tem|ref needed}} -> [citation needed] lolwut more like "citeneeded"), which further makes implementing this template more complicated and a chore than it needs to be. I think it should be reverted to {{tem|fact}} or at least make a template redirect. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:33, 6 May 2014 (EDT) | Considering that we used to have {{tem|fact}}, why are we using this one rather than the more widely-used {{tem|fact}} template? Besides, the name goes against the content ({{tem|ref needed}} -> [citation needed] lolwut more like "citeneeded"), which further makes implementing this template more complicated and a chore than it needs to be. I think it should be reverted to {{tem|fact}} or at least make a template redirect. {{User:Mario/sig}} 14:33, 6 May 2014 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 20:31, September 27, 2024
What is the difference between this and template:fact? HyperToad
Never mind. HyperToad
released[edit]
When putting this template into a {{flag list}} template, it screws the released one up. Is there a possible fix for that? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:16, 4 June 2009 (EDT)
Nomenclature[edit]
Considering that we used to have {{fact}}, why are we using this one rather than the more widely-used {{fact}} template? Besides, the name goes against the content ({{ref needed}} -> [citation needed] lolwut more like "citeneeded"), which further makes implementing this template more complicated and a chore than it needs to be. I think it should be reverted to {{fact}} or at least make a template redirect. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:33, 6 May 2014 (EDT)
