MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Baby Luigi: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Marcelagus (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Uhm, Starry Parakarry, you really shouldn't support nominations if you think the article is not FA-worthy yet. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:03, 12 August 2008 (EDT) | Uhm, Starry Parakarry, you really shouldn't support nominations if you think the article is not FA-worthy yet. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 06:03, 12 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
:Hey, you shouldn't be trying to convince users to not support. I still think fan votes shouldn't count... but whatever. {{User:Garlic Man/sig}} | :Hey, you shouldn't be trying to convince users to not support. I still think fan votes shouldn't count... but whatever. {{User:Garlic Man/sig}} | ||
::Huh, why not? I'm not trying to "convince" anybody, what I'm saying is just what the rules say: FAs are the "best the wiki has to offer" (or should be), and if an article can be largely improved and expanded, it isn't FA-worthy yet. Supporting such an article is a contradiction: Why would you present an article as outstanding, when in fact it can be largely improved? Do you want to present something "half-finished" as the best the wiki has to offer? {{User:Time Q/sig}} 13:43, 12 August 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:43, August 12, 2008
Baby Luigi
Support
- Marcelagus (T • C • E) -- Game section is chronologically organized, plenty of information. I don't think the game sections for the Yoshi series sectino can be much more expanded than that, as Luigi is the "Damsel in Distress".
- Per Garlic Man White Knight (talk)
- per everyone Mrsdaisyluigi (talk)
Starry Parakarry 
- I agree. You can't say much else because he wasn't a major part in the story except a damsel in distress. It tells his stats, has a good amount of pics, the only thing I could think to add would be a relationships section. I'll try to work on that ASAP
Oppose
Comments
Uhm, Starry Parakarry, you really shouldn't support nominations if you think the article is not FA-worthy yet. Time Questions 06:03, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
- Hey, you shouldn't be trying to convince users to not support. I still think fan votes shouldn't count... but whatever. Marcelagus (T • C • E)
- Huh, why not? I'm not trying to "convince" anybody, what I'm saying is just what the rules say: FAs are the "best the wiki has to offer" (or should be), and if an article can be largely improved and expanded, it isn't FA-worthy yet. Supporting such an article is a contradiction: Why would you present an article as outstanding, when in fact it can be largely improved? Do you want to present something "half-finished" as the best the wiki has to offer? Time Questions 13:43, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
