MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Smash Bros.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}} | ||
'''Super Smash Bros. became unfeatured at 15:58, 14 May 2010.''' | '''Super Smash Bros. became unfeatured at 15:58, 14 May 2010.''' | ||
Latest revision as of 16:42, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Smash Bros. became unfeatured at 15:58, 14 May 2010.
Super Smash Bros.[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) At a first glance, this article is a long article with plenty of pictures. At a closer glance, though, there is a slew of grammar errors (I even corrected a few "you's".) Not only that, but the information on each character/pokeball pokemon/stage are vague one-two liners. (Link is a character with medium weight, strength and speed. He uses his sword to attack.) I didn't know he uses his sword to attack! The stages in single-player mode looks really messy too. The article is not very well organized either. The best of what Mario Wiki has to offer? I've seen better articles.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though Super Smash Bros. is an awesome game with awesome explosion noises and tornadoes, I have to say this is not a very great article. The section Non-playable characters list such characters twice already. And I don't see what's the point of having list of Pokemon in this article when it's already covered in this article (though it's relatively easy to fix). The rest of the reasons I have, LGM covered it.
- Coincollector (talk) - Agree. Some sections repeat the same info (playable chracters, non-playable, etc...). The reception section needs a hand too.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) Unfortuantely, I have to agree with everyone.
- KS3 (talk) Per all.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) Despite my love for the Smash Bros. series, this just has mess, mess, mess, more mess, and a boring list of pokemon.
- Luigi=awesome Same as above.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
I nominated the article at 05:25, 7 May 2010. Can someone add that at the top of the page? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- Urgh...BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
BLOF, I wouldn't want to go to another page just to see the pokemon. They are fine here. All they need, though, is expansion and possibly a rewriting. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- I could just easily copy pasta that information from that article with absolutely no effort at all!!!! :( BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
