MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Galaxy: Difference between revisions
Booderdash (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (20 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{FA archive notice|nominated=17:59, 1 July 2009 (EDT)|passed=10:51, 10 July 2009 (EDT)}} | |||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc. | #{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 11: | ||
#{{User|Gamer2.1}} I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical. | #{{User|Gamer2.1}} I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical. | ||
#{{User|SpriteYoshi}}per all | #{{User|SpriteYoshi}}per all | ||
#{{User|Doopliss rocks}} Great page, & love the game. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:42, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Mario Galaxy was nominated to be a featured article at 17:59, 1 July 2009 (EDT) and passed at 09:51, 17 July 2009.
Super Mario Galaxy
Support
- Super Mario Bros. (talk) Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
- McQueenMario (talk) Per Super Mario Bros.
- YellowYoshi127 (talk) Yoshi! Yes, it does meet the requirements and yes, it is a great page. (Been on it millions)
- This...game...IS SO EPIC!!!Stick2012 15:51, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
- I agree, well-written but a couple too many lists for my liking, but still Marioguy1 (talk)
- RPGCRAZIEE (talk) This article is just as the game, great! It has very good information.
- Gamer2.1 (talk) I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical.
- SpriteYoshi (talk)per all
- Doopliss rocks (talk) Great page, & love the game.
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
Okay, to get more in depth about the qualifications. Super Mario Galaxy is a well written, descriptive, un-biased, and detailed article, going into depth about the game and is not tagged with any improvement tags. It has good quality images, to the extent that a few of them are featured images themselves and a couple of others are/were nominated. It has citations where needed, and the beggining of the article is a good detailed lead that would look good on the Main Page. If I am correct, it has no (and if I'm wrong, very few) redlinks covering the page. It, overall, is a quality article and deserves to be featured. Super Mario Bros. (talk)
- This is probably the best article currently nominated for FA right now.SpriteYoshi (talk)
