MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Diddy Kong Racing: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{FA archive notice|nominated=16:07, 13 October 2009 (EDT)|passed=23:51, 25 October 2009 (EDT)}}
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=16:07, 13 October 2009
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}}- I've worked hard on this and now I believe it is FA worthy!
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}}- I've worked hard on this and now I believe it is FA worthy!
#{{User|DiddyKing}}- It looks fantastic after all your work! It definitely deserves to be featured.
#{{User|DiddyKing}}- It looks fantastic after all your work! It definitely deserves to be featured.
#{{User|Ratfink43}} I agree!! It has lots of information!! You can practiclly know everything about this game by looking at this article without even playing the game!
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - I can't see anything wrong with it. All my problems have been taken care of.
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - And five, so the requirements for the featured article status are met. The manual copy story section was replaced by a self-written text, more images were added, and so on and so on. Any minor flaws that might have slipped from our vision shouldn't matter enough to interfere with the nomination.
#{{User|Booderdash}} Per everyone... though this is the first I've heard of this game.


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Marioguy1}} - Sorry, there just isn't a large enough amount of images near the top of the article. There are a bunch of long droning tables: Try moving some images from the bottom or uploading more :)
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - You have done a great job with this article so far. However, there are still a few things left that have to be done. The article lacks some vital links, like links to the battle game stages and such. Some structure could be added (I am kinda sceptical about the 1:1 copy of the manual text), and like Marioguy1 said, some sections lack images. I also found a opinionated section, which I corrected. The article made a great step towards FA status, but there's still some way left.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
Just so everyone knows, I am improving the stats section so... yeah you know what I mean.{{User|Fawfulfury65}}


Just so everyone knows, I am improving the stats section so... yeah you know what I mean.{{User|Fawfulfury65}}
Edofenrir: Why are you "sceptical" about the story from the instruction manual? {{user|Fawfulfury65}}
:Because I prefer self-written summaries over summaries copied from the instruction manual. I think it sound better to hand-type a paragraph instead of copying what someone else wrote. It's personal preference I guess. - {{User|Edofenrir}} 15:36, 19 October 2009 (EDT)
 
Marioguy1, there's no way to add anything in the story section since most of it is from the instruction booklet. I'll try to find something but keep that in mind. {{User|Fawfulfury65}}
:OK, you added enough images for me {{User|Marioguy1}}
::Funny how you wrote that comment just while I added two more Images to the article oO - {{User|Edofenrir}}

Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Diddy Kong Racing was nominated to be a featured article at 16:07, 13 October 2009 (EDT) and passed at 22:51, 1 November 2009.


Diddy Kong Racing

Support

  1. Fawfulfury65 (talk)- I've worked hard on this and now I believe it is FA worthy!
  2. DiddyKing (talk)- It looks fantastic after all your work! It definitely deserves to be featured.
  3. Ratfink43 (talk) I agree!! It has lots of information!! You can practiclly know everything about this game by looking at this article without even playing the game!
  4. Marioguy1 (talk) - I can't see anything wrong with it. All my problems have been taken care of.
  5. Edofenrir (talk) - And five, so the requirements for the featured article status are met. The manual copy story section was replaced by a self-written text, more images were added, and so on and so on. Any minor flaws that might have slipped from our vision shouldn't matter enough to interfere with the nomination.
  6. Booderdash (talk) Per everyone... though this is the first I've heard of this game.

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

Just so everyone knows, I am improving the stats section so... yeah you know what I mean.Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Edofenrir: Why are you "sceptical" about the story from the instruction manual? Fawfulfury65 (talk)

Because I prefer self-written summaries over summaries copied from the instruction manual. I think it sound better to hand-type a paragraph instead of copying what someone else wrote. It's personal preference I guess. - Edofenrir (talk) 15:36, 19 October 2009 (EDT)

Marioguy1, there's no way to add anything in the story section since most of it is from the instruction booklet. I'll try to find something but keep that in mind. Fawfulfury65 (talk)

OK, you added enough images for me Marioguy1 (talk)
Funny how you wrote that comment just while I added two more Images to the article oO - Edofenrir (talk)