MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Toadette: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "__NOTOC__ ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== {{FANOMSTAT |nominated=~~~~~ |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/r...") |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{FA archive notice|nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT)|passed=21:34, 1 August 2011 (EDT)}} | |||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | |||
|nominated=17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
|passed= | |||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured. | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
#{{User|YoshiGo99}} | |||
#{{User|DKPetey99}} | |||
#{{User|Goomba's Shoe15}} | |||
#{{User|Toadette rules}} | |||
#{{User|Byllant}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 12: | Line 16: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
There is still work that must be done. I'll try to add as much as I can to it. {{User|DKPetey99}} 17:31, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
Like where? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
Look at my oppose vote. {{User|DKPetey99}} 17:34, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
I don't see how Mario Party 6 and 8 need expansion. In Mario Party Advance, maybe it needs expansion, but I never played the game. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
I personally think we should merge the Mario Party section into one. {{User|DKPetey99}} 17:38, 1 August 2011 (EDT) | |||
I'm done. What do you think? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Toadette was nominated to be a featured article at 17:16, 1 August 2011 (EDT) and passed at 20:34, 8 August 2011.
Toadette
Support
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) I've looked through this article and I found no tense errors or missing information. The article is written like an article (not a story), and there are enough images. All the sections have enough information possible. I think this article is fit to be featured.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
- YoshiGo99 (talk)
- DKPetey99 (talk)
- Goomba's Shoe15 (talk)
- Toadette rules (talk)
- Byllant (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
There is still work that must be done. I'll try to add as much as I can to it. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:31, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
Like where? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
Look at my oppose vote. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
I don't see how Mario Party 6 and 8 need expansion. In Mario Party Advance, maybe it needs expansion, but I never played the game. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I personally think we should merge the Mario Party section into one. DKPetey99 (talk) 17:38, 1 August 2011 (EDT)
I'm done. What do you think? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
