MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N3/Kirby: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
{{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}}
|nominated=23:10, 13 March 2015 (EDT)
Kirby was nominated to be unfeatured at 23:10, 13 March 2015 (EDT) and passed at 10:36, 22 April 2015.
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Time Turner}} The fact that Smash 4 is basically completely missing from this article is already a huge strike against it (it's been a few months already, it's a valid point to make). No updated information, no new images, no descriptions of what's different... Besides that, though, the article has other problems; the moves have some noticeable tense issues (he ''can'' do this, he ''will'' do that, etc.), the Melee and Brawl sections are really short and what's there reeks of being poorly written, the Subspace Emissary is bloated with extraneous information, the comics are really short even though the information's perfectly accessible on the articles they link to, the images for the "forms" sections are wildly-different in size and quality and several images (the 3DS ones, for example) are clearly jagged, the profiles and statistics aren't well-organized, and to top it all off, the intro really isn't something that'd be used as an example of [[MarioWiki:Good Writing|Good Writing]]. Regardless of the fact that this article should have been updated a while ago, this shouldn't be a featured article.
#{{User|Time Turner}} The fact that Smash 4 is basically completely missing from this article is already a huge strike against it (it's been a few months already, it's a valid point to make). No updated information, no new images, no descriptions of what's different... Besides that, though, the article has other problems; the moves have some noticeable tense issues (he ''can'' do this, he ''will'' do that, etc.), the Melee and Brawl sections are really short and what's there reeks of being poorly written, the Subspace Emissary is bloated with extraneous information, the comics are really short even though the information's perfectly accessible on the articles they link to, the images for the "forms" sections are wildly-different in size and quality and several images (the 3DS ones, for example) are clearly jagged, the profiles and statistics aren't well-organized, and to top it all off, the intro really isn't something that'd be used as an example of [[MarioWiki:Good writing|Good Writing]]. Regardless of the fact that this article should have been updated a while ago, this shouldn't be a featured article.
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Per.
#{{User|Mario}} Per. Not the best the wiki has to offer. Also, trivia section is a bit too long for me to be comfortable, and the table is just so... eh... it wasn't bad initially, but there's really no need to put images from each and every game.
#{{User|Burningdragon25}} Per all.
#{{User|Zakor1138}} Per all. Also, no info on Kirby's appearance in the NES Remix games, since Kirby was integrated with Mario-related remixes.
#{{User|Koopinator}} Per Time turner. The first thing I noticed was the bad intro.
#{{User|Burningdragon25}} Per all in this one!


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====

Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024

Kirby[edit]

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.


Kirby was nominated to be unfeatured at 23:10, 13 March 2015 (EDT) and passed at 10:36, 22 April 2015.

Remove Featured Article Status[edit]

  1. Time Turner (talk) The fact that Smash 4 is basically completely missing from this article is already a huge strike against it (it's been a few months already, it's a valid point to make). No updated information, no new images, no descriptions of what's different... Besides that, though, the article has other problems; the moves have some noticeable tense issues (he can do this, he will do that, etc.), the Melee and Brawl sections are really short and what's there reeks of being poorly written, the Subspace Emissary is bloated with extraneous information, the comics are really short even though the information's perfectly accessible on the articles they link to, the images for the "forms" sections are wildly-different in size and quality and several images (the 3DS ones, for example) are clearly jagged, the profiles and statistics aren't well-organized, and to top it all off, the intro really isn't something that'd be used as an example of Good Writing. Regardless of the fact that this article should have been updated a while ago, this shouldn't be a featured article.
  2. Yoshi876 (talk) Per.
  3. Mario (talk) Per. Not the best the wiki has to offer. Also, trivia section is a bit too long for me to be comfortable, and the table is just so... eh... it wasn't bad initially, but there's really no need to put images from each and every game.
  4. Burningdragon25 (talk) Per all.
  5. Zakor1138 (talk) Per all. Also, no info on Kirby's appearance in the NES Remix games, since Kirby was integrated with Mario-related remixes.
  6. Koopinator (talk) Per Time turner. The first thing I noticed was the bad intro.
  7. Burningdragon25 (talk) Per all in this one!

Keep Featured Article Status[edit]

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]

Comments[edit]

I think the Kirby hats should use one screenshot from the latest game it's in unless there are completely different hats (which I doubt). BabyLuigiFire.pngRay Trace(T|C) 23:22, 13 March 2015 (EDT)

Having something uniform would be the most convenient, but the issue is with actually getting someone to grab the images. I do agree that having an image next to a shinier version of it is kinda pointless. Hello, I'm Time Turner.