MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Hammer Bro.: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(17 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}}
'''Hammer Bro. became unfeatured at 03:29, 8 March 2010.'''
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{UNFANOMSTAT
|nominated=11:27, 27 February 2010 (EST)
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet  by copying it from the history of the page.-->
}}
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
==== Remove Featured Article Status ====
#{{User|Reversinator}} First off, this article is greatly lacking in images. Second, some of the sections are greatly lacking in images (I'm looking at you Mario Party series and Mario Smash Football). And third, it has some useless information, like in the New Super Mario Bros. Wii section, "This is the first time to feature both Hammer Bros. and Yoshis in a game that's not a spin-off title. It is also the first time to show Yoshi's inability to eat them."
#{{User|Reversinator}} First off, this article is greatly lacking in images. Second, some of the sections are greatly lacking in information (I'm looking at you Mario Party series and Mario Smash Football). And third, it has some useless information, like in the New Super Mario Bros. Wii section, "This is the first time to feature both Hammer Bros. and Yoshis in a game that's not a spin-off title. It is also the first time to show Yoshi's inability to eat them."
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} The Paper Mario templates are all messed up looking. Per Reversinator.
#{{User|Fawfulfury65}} The Paper Mario templates are all messed up looking. Per Reversinator.
#{{User|MATEOELBACAN}} Per all (And has a request image template...)
#{{User|KS3}} Per all.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} A lot of sections (some include Mario Party DS, Mario Party 8, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii) has unnecessary information. Some sections need expanding(Mario Party). The Paper Mario section has this big white space in between the template, hence "very messed up." Finally, there is a request for images template. This is certainly not the best MarioWiki can offer.
#{{User|4DJONG}} Well, there is unnecessary information, low image count,and then there is a short section so, it no longer deserves to be a Featured Article.


==== Keep Featured Article Status ====
==== Keep Featured Article Status ====

Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.


Hammer Bro. became unfeatured at 03:29, 8 March 2010.

Hammer Bro.[edit]

Remove Featured Article Status[edit]

  1. Reversinator (talk) First off, this article is greatly lacking in images. Second, some of the sections are greatly lacking in information (I'm looking at you Mario Party series and Mario Smash Football). And third, it has some useless information, like in the New Super Mario Bros. Wii section, "This is the first time to feature both Hammer Bros. and Yoshis in a game that's not a spin-off title. It is also the first time to show Yoshi's inability to eat them."
  2. Fawfulfury65 (talk) The Paper Mario templates are all messed up looking. Per Reversinator.
  3. MATEOELBACAN (talk) Per all (And has a request image template...)
  4. KS3 (talk) Per all.
  5. LeftyGreenMario (talk) A lot of sections (some include Mario Party DS, Mario Party 8, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii) has unnecessary information. Some sections need expanding(Mario Party). The Paper Mario section has this big white space in between the template, hence "very messed up." Finally, there is a request for images template. This is certainly not the best MarioWiki can offer.
  6. 4DJONG (talk) Well, there is unnecessary information, low image count,and then there is a short section so, it no longer deserves to be a Featured Article.

Keep Featured Article Status[edit]

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]

Comments[edit]