MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Hammer Bro.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (L151 moved page MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Hammer Bro. to MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Hammer Bro. without leaving a redirect) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}} | ||
'''Hammer Bro. became unfeatured at 03:29, 8 March 2010.''' | '''Hammer Bro. became unfeatured at 03:29, 8 March 2010.''' | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Hammer Bro. became unfeatured at 03:29, 8 March 2010.
Hammer Bro.[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- Reversinator (talk) First off, this article is greatly lacking in images. Second, some of the sections are greatly lacking in information (I'm looking at you Mario Party series and Mario Smash Football). And third, it has some useless information, like in the New Super Mario Bros. Wii section, "This is the first time to feature both Hammer Bros. and Yoshis in a game that's not a spin-off title. It is also the first time to show Yoshi's inability to eat them."
- Fawfulfury65 (talk) The Paper Mario templates are all messed up looking. Per Reversinator.
- MATEOELBACAN (talk) Per all (And has a request image template...)
- KS3 (talk) Per all.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) A lot of sections (some include Mario Party DS, Mario Party 8, and New Super Mario Bros. Wii) has unnecessary information. Some sections need expanding(Mario Party). The Paper Mario section has this big white space in between the template, hence "very messed up." Finally, there is a request for images template. This is certainly not the best MarioWiki can offer.
- 4DJONG (talk) Well, there is unnecessary information, low image count,and then there is a short section so, it no longer deserves to be a Featured Article.
