MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||4}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}} | ||
| | '''Mario & Luigi:Superstar Saga became unfeatured at 15:51, 27 March 2013''' | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} I could just quote the reasons for unfeaturing this game's sequels ''verbatim''. As of now, there are rewrite tags for the story (due to its abundance of flowery writing and poorly-written sentences), the sidequests (due to its bareness and bad formatting), and the items (again, due to its bareness), and all of these tags were added a while before this unfeature nomination. While I congratulate the article for not having a bunch of trivia pieces in its trivia section, the article is still breaking the empty section policy, which is yet another reason why this article does not deserve to be featured. The enemy images also tend to vary between .gif and .png, when they should all be consistently .png. | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} I could just quote the reasons for unfeaturing this game's sequels ''verbatim''. As of now, there are rewrite tags for the story (due to its abundance of flowery writing and poorly-written sentences), the sidequests (due to its bareness and bad formatting), and the items (again, due to its bareness), and all of these tags were added a while before this unfeature nomination. While I congratulate the article for not having a bunch of trivia pieces in its trivia section, the article is still breaking the empty section policy, which is yet another reason why this article does not deserve to be featured. The enemy images also tend to vary between .gif and .png, when they should all be consistently .png. | ||
| Line 10: | Line 8: | ||
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} Per all. | #{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|King Pikante}} Per all. | #{{User|King Pikante}} Per all. | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Per nomination. There also seems to be a random Green Warp Pipes section in the end of the article for some reason. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Per nomination. There also seems to be a random Green Warp Pipes section in the end of the article for some reason. Also, the opening paragraph feels... weak for me. | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024
Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga[edit]
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Mario & Luigi:Superstar Saga became unfeatured at 15:51, 27 March 2013
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- GreenDisaster (talk) I could just quote the reasons for unfeaturing this game's sequels verbatim. As of now, there are rewrite tags for the story (due to its abundance of flowery writing and poorly-written sentences), the sidequests (due to its bareness and bad formatting), and the items (again, due to its bareness), and all of these tags were added a while before this unfeature nomination. While I congratulate the article for not having a bunch of trivia pieces in its trivia section, the article is still breaking the empty section policy, which is yet another reason why this article does not deserve to be featured. The enemy images also tend to vary between .gif and .png, when they should all be consistently .png.
- Yoshi876 (talk) Per GD.
- Marshal Dan Troop (talk) Per all.
- King Pikante (talk) Per all.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Per nomination. There also seems to be a random Green Warp Pipes section in the end of the article for some reason. Also, the opening paragraph feels... weak for me.
