MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario 64 DS: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: __NOTOC__ ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== {{FANOMSTAT |nominated=~~~~~ |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by...) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{FA archive notice|nominated=20:16, 4 July 2009 (EDT)|passed=20:31, 7 September 2009 (EDT)}} | |||
===[[Super Mario 64 DS]]=== | |||
|nominated=20:16, 4 July 2009 (EDT) | |||
|passed= | |||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Written well, almost in the same format as [[Super Mario 64]], which is also a featured article. Only has redlinks in the Rec Room section. | #{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Written well, almost in the same format as [[Super Mario 64]], which is also a featured article. Only has redlinks in the Rec Room section. | ||
#{{User|Gamer 2.1}} Pretty good artical, and I like that he added the other case. | |||
#{{User|Marioguy1}} Good, could use a little bit more templates in the different suits section but still good. | |||
#{{User|SpriteYoshi}} Per All | |||
#the game looks fun {{unsigned|Baby dk}} | |||
#{{User|Mario64fanatic}} My name says all | |||
#{{User|fawfulfury65}} Most of the red links have been filled in and there is a massive amount of info. | |||
#{{User|McQueenMario}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|T.c.w7468}} Per all. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Mario 64 DS was nominated to be a featured article at 20:16, 4 July 2009 (EDT) and passed at 19:31, 14 September 2009.
Super Mario 64 DS
Support
- Super Mario Bros. (talk) Written well, almost in the same format as Super Mario 64, which is also a featured article. Only has redlinks in the Rec Room section.
- Gamer 2.1 (talk) Pretty good artical, and I like that he added the other case.
- Marioguy1 (talk) Good, could use a little bit more templates in the different suits section but still good.
- SpriteYoshi (talk) Per All
- the game looks fun
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Baby dk (talk). - Mario64fanatic (talk) My name says all
- fawfulfury65 (talk) Most of the red links have been filled in and there is a massive amount of info.
- McQueenMario (talk) Per all.
- T.c.w7468 (talk) Per all.
