MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Wii: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Marcelagus (talk | contribs) (New page: __NOTOC__ ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== {{FANOMSTAT |nominated=~~~~~ |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last opposet by...) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{FA archive notice|nominated=02:42, 24 January 2010 (EST)|passed=18:25, 25 January 2010 (EST)}} | |||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Garlic Man}} -- This article now contains plenty of information and images, and follows the guidelines of a featured article. | #{{User|Garlic Man}} -- This article now contains plenty of information and images, and follows the guidelines of a featured article. | ||
#{{User|Edofenrir}} - I'm not a too big fan of the subject, but fortunately that is irrelevant for our FA standards. The article seems long enough to me, has a good deal of images, and should present the subject fairly well. | |||
#{{User|Byllant}} - It still misses some channels, but perhaps thay are absent becuase they cannot be downloaded from the Wii Shop Channel normally (those who need a gift code or a game), so well, I support. | |||
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Don't see anything wrong with it, even though images in the beginning look sort of misplaced. Anyway, per all. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Wii was nominated to be a featured article at 02:42, 24 January 2010 (EST) and passed at 18:25, 1 February 2010.
Wii
Support
- Garlic Man (talk) -- This article now contains plenty of information and images, and follows the guidelines of a featured article.
- Edofenrir (talk) - I'm not a too big fan of the subject, but fortunately that is irrelevant for our FA standards. The article seems long enough to me, has a good deal of images, and should present the subject fairly well.
- Byllant (talk) - It still misses some channels, but perhaps thay are absent becuase they cannot be downloaded from the Wii Shop Channel normally (those who need a gift code or a game), so well, I support.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) Per all.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Don't see anything wrong with it, even though images in the beginning look sort of misplaced. Anyway, per all.
