MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario Superstar Baseball: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FA archive notice|nominated=17:01, 9 April 2012 (EDT)|passed=11:45, 29 May 2012 (EDT)}}
{{FANOMSTAT
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
|nominated=17:01, 9 April 2012 (EDT)
|passed=16:47, 29 May 2012 (GMT)
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} [[User:BabyLuigiOnFire|BLOF]] and I created a nomination that failed a while ago, mainly due to the bad quality images that illustrate the characters. However, we reuploaded much better, in-game-like quality images, so that single argument that prevented this article to be featured is basically moot. If you think the images aren't good enough, well, the new pictures are one of the best we can get; blame it on the game's models, not the picture. The game's content really shouldn't be the deciding factor to feature an article anyway. Otherwise, this article is top-notch, mostly complete, and well-written. It should be featured.
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} [[User:BabyLuigiOnFire|BLOF]] and I created a nomination that failed a while ago, mainly due to the bad quality images that illustrate the characters. However, we reuploaded much better, in-game-like quality images, so that single argument that prevented this article to be featured is basically moot. If you think the images aren't good enough, well, the new pictures are one of the best we can get; blame it on the game's models, not the picture. The game's content really shouldn't be the deciding factor to feature an article anyway. Otherwise, this article is top-notch, mostly complete, and well-written. It should be featured.
Line 15: Line 12:


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Mario Superstar Baseball was nominated to be a featured article at 17:01, 9 April 2012 (EDT) and passed at 10:45, 5 June 2012.


Mario Superstar Baseball

Support

  1. LeftyGreenMario (talk) BLOF and I created a nomination that failed a while ago, mainly due to the bad quality images that illustrate the characters. However, we reuploaded much better, in-game-like quality images, so that single argument that prevented this article to be featured is basically moot. If you think the images aren't good enough, well, the new pictures are one of the best we can get; blame it on the game's models, not the picture. The game's content really shouldn't be the deciding factor to feature an article anyway. Otherwise, this article is top-notch, mostly complete, and well-written. It should be featured.
  2. Commander Code-8 (talk)
  3. Humbug (talk)
  4. Vommack (talk)
  5. New Super Yoshi (talk)

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

LGM!!! The character screenshots I took during the time are not the best they can get! It was before we configured the emulator for bigger images. The only character who has the better screenshot than everyone else is Baby Luigi (duh). You should take a closer look. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Well, most of the ones we have are not bad. But if you insist, we can reupload the characters in a much bigger resolution. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I'm probably wrong about this, but I though emulator images weren't allowed on the wiki. GreenDisaster (talk)
No are allowed. You see our screenshots we took? Those are actually emulator images. The images that are impossible to achieve by normal game means (ala widescreen, hacking, cheats, yada yada) are NOT allowed. Emulators allow for higher quality, crisper screenshots. They are perfectly fine and normal. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
Ah. Gotcha. Also, "No are allowed"? GreenDisaster (talk)
That's my mistake in part of my fatigue. I mean to say, "No, they are allowed." BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)

Anyone else noticed that the template on the page doesn't actually link to the nomination page. Does anyone know how to fix it? Commander Code-8 (talk) Yeah, it links to the failed nomination. I think we can put a link to this page for now, but I think there is a more sophisticated way of doing it. LeftyGreenMario (talk)