Talk:Super Mario FX: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Merge Super Mario FX into [[Super Mario 64/Beta elements]]== | ==Merge Super Mario FX into [[Super Mario 64/Beta elements]]== | ||
{{TPP}} | {{Settled TPP}} | ||
{{Proposal outcome|passed|5-0|Merge}} | |||
In the article it says that Super Mario FX became Super Mario 64. So we should merge them. | In the article it says that Super Mario FX became Super Mario 64. So we should merge them. | ||
'''Proposer:''' {{User:KS3/sig 2}}<br> | '''Proposer:''' {{User:KS3/sig 2}}<br> | ||
'''Deadline:''' | '''Deadline:''' May 17, 2010, 23:59 | ||
== | <div id=fh3 class=mw-headline>Support</div> | ||
#{{User|KS3}} We merged Super Mario RPG 2, we should merge this. | #{{User|KS3}} We merged Super Mario RPG 2, we should merge this. | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} Do we even need a proposal for this? | |||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Per all | |||
#{{User|King Bean}} - It was '''moved''', not cancelled. Per all. | |||
#{{User|Turkishcoffee}} Despite the fact I think IGN's reasoning may be off, that statement as well as my own research indicates a very high possibility they are the same game. | |||
== | <div id=fh3 class=mw-headline>Oppose</div> | ||
== | <div id=fh3 class=mw-headline>Comments</div> | ||
Turkishcoffee: In [[Super Mario 64/Beta elements]] it says that Super Mario FX became Super Mario 64. {{User:KS3/sig}} | |||
:But we're our only source for that information. If someone can find a second credible source I'll change my vote. --{{User:Turkishcoffee/sig}} 18:40, 7 May 2010 (EDT) | |||
::Wikipedia. Source found. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:33, May 31, 2024
Same problem here as Super Mario RPG 2.Knife (talk) 20:59, 27 February 2007 (EST)
Again, should be made into a redirect. Phoenix Rider
I think it has enough info to deserve its own article, even if it's not that long. Red.Tide 17:30, 28 February 2007 (EST)
Plus, it's not a beta -- it's a canned game. --Luigifan14 23:20, 4 April 2007 (EDT)
It should be a beta because as the article says, it was once going to be for the Super Nintendo but changed to be SM64 for the Nintendo 64. --A.J.theInsane 10:19, 6 June 2007 (EDT)
I say this should be merged with Beta Elements... ~Uniju(T-C-E)
- Merge this with Beta Elements, yes. My Bloody Valentine
Super Mario RPG[edit]
Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars is one of only three games outside Japan for the SNES to utilize the Nintendo SA-1. (The other two are Kirby Super Star and Kirby's Dream Land 3.)
So it didn't use the FX-something, I guess. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 04:52, 21 October 2007 (EDT)
Merge Super Mario FX into Super Mario 64/Beta elements[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
Merge 5-0
In the article it says that Super Mario FX became Super Mario 64. So we should merge them.
Proposer: KS3 (talk · contribute)
Deadline: May 17, 2010, 23:59
- KS3 (talk) We merged Super Mario RPG 2, we should merge this.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) Do we even need a proposal for this?
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Per all
- King Bean (talk) - It was moved, not cancelled. Per all.
- Turkishcoffee (talk) Despite the fact I think IGN's reasoning may be off, that statement as well as my own research indicates a very high possibility they are the same game.
Turkishcoffee: In Super Mario 64/Beta elements it says that Super Mario FX became Super Mario 64. KS3 (talk · contribute)
- But we're our only source for that information. If someone can find a second credible source I'll change my vote. --•Turkishcoffee «Talk»
18:40, 7 May 2010 (EDT)
- Wikipedia. Source found. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
