Talk:Arcade (Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam): Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2")
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Split {{fake link|Attackathon}} and {{fake link|Battle Ring (''Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam'')}} from this article==
==Split {{fake link|Attackathon}} and {{fake link|Battle Ring (''Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam'')}} from this article==
{{TPP}}
{{Settled TPP}}
{{Proposal outcome|passed|8-0|split this article}}
As it stands now, we have both the Attackathon and Battle Ring from Paper Jam covered in this article.  This is horribly inconsistent, as the [[Cholesteroad]] and [[The Gauntlet]] from Inside Story have their own articles, separate from [[Challenge Node]].  The Arcade is Paper Jam's equivalent to the Challenge Node, and it doesn't make any sense for the BIS minigames to have their own separate articles when PJ's minigames don't.  Therefore, I propose that we split Attackathon into its own article, and we split both Battle Rings into Battle Ring (''Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam'').  This article will still stay, however, to be consistent with Challenge Node.
As it stands now, we have both the Attackathon and Battle Ring from Paper Jam covered in this article.  This is horribly inconsistent, as the [[Cholesteroad]] and [[The Gauntlet]] from Inside Story have their own articles, separate from [[Challenge Node]].  The Arcade is Paper Jam's equivalent to the Challenge Node, and it doesn't make any sense for the BIS minigames to have their own separate articles when PJ's minigames don't.  Therefore, I propose that we split Attackathon into its own article, and we split both Battle Rings into Battle Ring (''Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam'').  This article will still stay, however, to be consistent with Challenge Node.


Line 12: Line 13:
#{{User|Bloober}} I have no idea why they are merged at all; wouldn't hurt to have them split into different articles.
#{{User|Bloober}} I have no idea why they are merged at all; wouldn't hurt to have them split into different articles.
#{{User|Doomhiker}} Per all.
#{{User|Doomhiker}} Per all.
#{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} I also agree. Per all.
#{{User|Scrooge200}} They're completely separate things. Per all.
#{{User|TheDarkStar}} Per all.
#{{User|WeirdDave13}} Per all.


====Oppose====
====Oppose====
====Comments====
====Comments====

Latest revision as of 16:27, May 31, 2024

Split Attackathon and Battle Ring (Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam) from this article[edit]

Brown Block This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit this section or its subsections. If you wish to discuss the article, please do so in a new section below the proposal.

split this article 8-0
As it stands now, we have both the Attackathon and Battle Ring from Paper Jam covered in this article. This is horribly inconsistent, as the Cholesteroad and The Gauntlet from Inside Story have their own articles, separate from Challenge Node. The Arcade is Paper Jam's equivalent to the Challenge Node, and it doesn't make any sense for the BIS minigames to have their own separate articles when PJ's minigames don't. Therefore, I propose that we split Attackathon into its own article, and we split both Battle Rings into Battle Ring (Mario & Luigi: Paper Jam). This article will still stay, however, to be consistent with Challenge Node.

P.S.: Yes, I know that Dream Team's Mad Skillathon still shares an article with the game itself, and I plan to deal with that shortly. After all, Battle Ring (Mario & Luigi: Dream Team) has its own separate article.

Proposer: YoshiFlutterJump (talk)
Deadline: May 23, 2019, 11:59 GMT

Support[edit]

  1. YoshiFlutterJump (talk) Per my proposal.
  2. FanOfYoshi (talk) Seems strange they were merged here in the first place.
  3. Bloober (talk) I have no idea why they are merged at all; wouldn't hurt to have them split into different articles.
  4. Doomhiker (talk) Per all.
  5. Owencrazyboy9 (talk) I also agree. Per all.
  6. Scrooge200 (talk) They're completely separate things. Per all.
  7. TheDarkStar (talk) Per all.
  8. WeirdDave13 (talk) Per all.

Oppose[edit]

Comments[edit]