Talk:Double Item Box: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2")
 
Line 2: Line 2:


==Merge [[Double Item Box]] into [[Item Box]]==
==Merge [[Double Item Box]] into [[Item Box]]==
{{SettledTPP}}
{{Settled TPP}}
{{ProposalOutcome|green|merge 6-0}}
{{Proposal outcome|green|merge 6-0}}
I read both of them, they are the same function, just that there are 2 of them. Double Item Box is short and Item Box is not short, so I propose that we merge them.
I read both of them, they are the same function, just that there are 2 of them. Double Item Box is short and Item Box is not short, so I propose that we merge them.



Latest revision as of 15:22, May 31, 2024

I think this should be merged into the ordinary Item Box page. Yoshi Time 15:20, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

Merge Double Item Box into Item Box[edit]

Settledproposal.svg This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal.

merge 6-0
I read both of them, they are the same function, just that there are 2 of them. Double Item Box is short and Item Box is not short, so I propose that we merge them.

Proposer: Red Shell 68066vr (talk)
Deadline: 17 February 2010, 17:00

Merge Them
  1. Red Shell 68066vr (talk)
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I see no reason why not to merge them. The double item box article is super duper short. I'm surprised it's not a stub, but if it is, then it can't be expanded since it appeared only in one game.
  3. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) - What's so special about a double item box besides appearance and giving the driving character an item? Tell me. That's why I support.
  4. Walkazo (talk) - Per all.
  5. Gamefreak75 (talk) Per all.
  6. Coincollector (talk) - Whoa, it's really short and not a stub 0o Per all.
Don't Merge Them
Comments