Talk:X-Naut ship: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
(→Rename: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST) | :::My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. [[User:Redstar|Redstar]] 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::::Definitely. But, seeing as the ship belongs to Lord Crump, not the X-Nauts, I think it should be merged with Lord Crump. {{User:Dry Paratroopa/sig}} | ::::Definitely. But, seeing as the ship belongs to Lord Crump, not the X-Nauts, I think it should be merged with Lord Crump. {{User:Dry Paratroopa/sig}} | ||
== Rename == | |||
{{talk}} | |||
This seems like an overly flashy name in my opinion. Even "X-Naut ship" would be better. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 18:33, December 28, 2023 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 18:33, December 28, 2023
If it's conjecturally named..., do we need this article?--Knife (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Many articles are named with conjectured titles, yet we maintain them. But, considering the shortness of this example, we could probably merge it to either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page (I favor the latter). Redstar 18:13, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--Knife (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. Redstar 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Definitely. But, seeing as the ship belongs to Lord Crump, not the X-Nauts, I think it should be merged with Lord Crump. User:Dry Paratroopa/sig
- My impression as well. If all relevant information is merged into either Lord Crump's or the X-Naut page, in either the story section or a new section, then I think this page could be deleted. Redstar 18:29, 18 December 2009 (EST)
- Yes, but we only give articles to conjecturally named subjects if they have some significance, like an enemy in SML2. However, the ship used by the X-Nauts in one chapter doesn't seem to be notable, especially since Nintendo didn't give it an official name.--Knife (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2009 (EST)
Rename
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
This seems like an overly flashy name in my opinion. Even "X-Naut ship" would be better. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 18:33, December 28, 2023 (EST)
