Talk:Cractus: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Somethingone (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (→Split?) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Based on the Japanese name. But I don't think this is just a typo here. So should I wait for further promotion/interview? {{User:Blhte/sig}} 00:24, November 3, 2023 (EDT) | ::Based on the Japanese name. But I don't think this is just a typo here. So should I wait for further promotion/interview? {{User:Blhte/sig}} 00:24, November 3, 2023 (EDT) | ||
:::Personal stance on this aside, yes, you should. Best not to make a jump like that without confirmation. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 00:28, November 3, 2023 (EDT) | :::Personal stance on this aside, yes, you should. Best not to make a jump like that without confirmation. {{User:Somethingone/sig}} 00:28, November 3, 2023 (EDT) | ||
::::Okay, I see {{User:Blhte/sig}} 00:30, November 3, 2023 (EDT) |
Revision as of 00:30, November 3, 2023
Cractus has a crown. Should he (or she, or it) be listed under our kings section? Jdrawer 10:55, 4 February 2012 (EST)
Split?
![]() |
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
I'm already aware of the difference in translation differences, and even Nintendo Japan has admitted twice that they've worked on this. The only problem is, the WWMI Cractus was more likely a reference to the original Cractus in JP name and appearance. Blhte(A****** c*****) 00:14, November 3, 2023 (EDT)
- I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing here, can you be a bit more clear as to why you think it should be split? If it's based on the Japanese name then that feels a bit too overboard, they could have just given Cractus an updated Japanese name and/or fixed a typo ("-wana" is not really that different from "-wani"; also see Battle Beetle). S o m e t h i n g o n e !
00:21, November 3, 2023 (EDT)
- Based on the Japanese name. But I don't think this is just a typo here. So should I wait for further promotion/interview?
Blhte(A****** c*****) 00:24, November 3, 2023 (EDT)
- Personal stance on this aside, yes, you should. Best not to make a jump like that without confirmation. S o m e t h i n g o n e !
00:28, November 3, 2023 (EDT)
- Okay, I see
Blhte(A****** c*****) 00:30, November 3, 2023 (EDT)
- Okay, I see
- Personal stance on this aside, yes, you should. Best not to make a jump like that without confirmation. S o m e t h i n g o n e !
- Based on the Japanese name. But I don't think this is just a typo here. So should I wait for further promotion/interview?