Talk:Main Page/Archive 20: Difference between revisions
m (→H4X0R) |
(Featured articles) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
A Warning from KP Blue: H4X0R is in town, we must knock him out, kick him in the balls 25 times, and finally, shoot him in the balls-[[User:KP Blue|KP Blue]] | A Warning from KP Blue: H4X0R is in town, we must knock him out, kick him in the balls 25 times, and finally, shoot him in the balls-[[User:KP Blue|KP Blue]] | ||
:Unless we can alternate between kicking and shooting, I don't care. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 23:44, 23 June 2008 (EDT) | :Unless we can alternate between kicking and shooting, I don't care. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 23:44, 23 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
== Featured articles == | |||
Featured articles have a major problem - many of them seem to have been identified as such only because of mass voting, but not because they were actually good enough. For example, the Luigi's Mansion isn't even done, and the incomplete Plot section is nine paragraphs about the first ten minutes of the game. That would mean that the plot, if the whole thing follows suit, would be more than 100 paragraphs long. On top of this, featuring articles on Wikipedia often leads to the articles decaying because of lack of interest (as a result of the editors deciding that once they've reached the highest rank the article can receive, there's not much left for the article). Imagine what happens to FAs here - they're nominated quickly, promoted quickly, and abandoned quickly. | |||
Another problem is the images. A Wiki should be usable by anyone - including 56k users. Any images at all would be a problem for some, but at this point, me being a broadband user notices the insane load times for many of the articles because of images. | |||
And the lack of sourcing creates a poor situation for an article. From what can be seen, lack of references only leads to articles being featured, it doesn't lead to them being of featured quality, and in fact allows people to sneak false content in, knowing that sources are not necessary. - [[User:A Link to the Past|A Link to the Past]] 02:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:10, June 24, 2008
H4X0R
A Warning from KP Blue: H4X0R is in town, we must knock him out, kick him in the balls 25 times, and finally, shoot him in the balls-KP Blue
- Unless we can alternate between kicking and shooting, I don't care. --
Chris 23:44, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Featured articles
Featured articles have a major problem - many of them seem to have been identified as such only because of mass voting, but not because they were actually good enough. For example, the Luigi's Mansion isn't even done, and the incomplete Plot section is nine paragraphs about the first ten minutes of the game. That would mean that the plot, if the whole thing follows suit, would be more than 100 paragraphs long. On top of this, featuring articles on Wikipedia often leads to the articles decaying because of lack of interest (as a result of the editors deciding that once they've reached the highest rank the article can receive, there's not much left for the article). Imagine what happens to FAs here - they're nominated quickly, promoted quickly, and abandoned quickly.
Another problem is the images. A Wiki should be usable by anyone - including 56k users. Any images at all would be a problem for some, but at this point, me being a broadband user notices the insane load times for many of the articles because of images.
And the lack of sourcing creates a poor situation for an article. From what can be seen, lack of references only leads to articles being featured, it doesn't lead to them being of featured quality, and in fact allows people to sneak false content in, knowing that sources are not necessary. - A Link to the Past 02:10, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
