Talk:False Diddy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Why not merge this article to Diddy Kong's article -subspace emmisary, SSBB section? {{User:Coincollector/sig}} 15:16, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
Why not merge this article to Diddy Kong's article -subspace emmisary, SSBB section? {{User:Coincollector/sig}} 15:16, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
:That would look way to messy and just make it looking like we have all huge articles besides, Peach nad Zelda have their own article for this annnnnnd there is an article called [[Dark Being]] (wich needs some work) wich talks about the false versions and merging would totaly defeat the purpose for their articles- to show they are two different things, if anything merge to Dark Being.{{user:theused/sig}}
:That would look way to messy and just make it looking like we have all huge articles besides, Peach nad Zelda have their own article for this annnnnnd there is an article called [[Dark Being]] (wich needs some work) wich talks about the false versions and merging would totaly defeat the purpose for their articles- to show they are two different things, if anything merge to Dark Being.{{user:theused/sig}}
::Well couldn't we merge all the "false" characters with Dark Being. Either that or merge each "false" character with whomever from which he or she is copied. I don't think that each of these "false" characters merit an exclusive article [[User:Goomb-omb|Goomb-omb]] 16:06, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
:::I think the most reasonable choice is to merge all of them to Dark Being like I said before, definatly not with the charcter's article...{{user:theused/sig}}

Latest revision as of 15:35, June 19, 2008

Why not merge this article to Diddy Kong's article -subspace emmisary, SSBB section? ¢oincollctor rsitem209.png 15:16, 19 June 2008 (EDT)

That would look way to messy and just make it looking like we have all huge articles besides, Peach nad Zelda have their own article for this annnnnnd there is an article called Dark Being (wich needs some work) wich talks about the false versions and merging would totaly defeat the purpose for their articles- to show they are two different things, if anything merge to Dark Being.Δ ΔTheuseD.PNGΔ Δ
Well couldn't we merge all the "false" characters with Dark Being. Either that or merge each "false" character with whomever from which he or she is copied. I don't think that each of these "false" characters merit an exclusive article Goomb-omb 16:06, 19 June 2008 (EDT)
I think the most reasonable choice is to merge all of them to Dark Being like I said before, definatly not with the charcter's article...Δ ΔTheuseD.PNGΔ Δ