Talk:History of Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
CoolNintendo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think the idea was brought up somewhere, but this really should have had a proposal first. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 16:58, May 19, 2023 (EDT) | :I think the idea was brought up somewhere, but this really should have had a proposal first. {{User:Swallow/sig}} 16:58, May 19, 2023 (EDT) | ||
::I saw a link to [[MarioWiki:Article size]] in the edit summary and it says that >100KB pages "almost certainly should be divided" so i think it's a rule here i guess. i actually think i approve of the rule because my computer in general sometimes lags when going on those articles -CoolNintendo | ::I saw a link to [[MarioWiki:Article size]] in the edit summary and it says that >100KB pages "almost certainly should be divided" so i think it's a rule here i guess. i actually think i approve of the rule because my computer in general sometimes lags when going on those articles -CoolNintendo | ||
:::Yeah I decided to split because our policy outlines it explicitly, and it even has a listed example concerning Mario's page, mama mia. "For example, summarizing the "History" section of Mario to give a much more top-level overview and using {{tem|main}} to link to a new page entitled "History of Mario"." Bowser's article SHOULD get a split, pronto too. The only reason it hasn't happened is that IMO the initiative hasn't been taken yet (it's not an easy undertaking). I decided just today to take it. {{User:Mario/sig}} 17:09, May 19, 2023 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 16:09, May 19, 2023
i dont understand why was this split? are we going to split other character history pages too now? Bowser article is ginormous
— The preceding unsigned comment was added by CoolNintendo (talk).
- I think the idea was brought up somewhere, but this really should have had a proposal first.
Nightwicked Bowser 
16:58, May 19, 2023 (EDT)
- I saw a link to MarioWiki:Article size in the edit summary and it says that >100KB pages "almost certainly should be divided" so i think it's a rule here i guess. i actually think i approve of the rule because my computer in general sometimes lags when going on those articles -CoolNintendo
- Yeah I decided to split because our policy outlines it explicitly, and it even has a listed example concerning Mario's page, mama mia. "For example, summarizing the "History" section of Mario to give a much more top-level overview and using {{main}} to link to a new page entitled "History of Mario"." Bowser's article SHOULD get a split, pronto too. The only reason it hasn't happened is that IMO the initiative hasn't been taken yet (it's not an easy undertaking). I decided just today to take it.
Mario-HOHO! (Talk / Stalk) 17:09, May 19, 2023 (EDT)
- Yeah I decided to split because our policy outlines it explicitly, and it even has a listed example concerning Mario's page, mama mia. "For example, summarizing the "History" section of Mario to give a much more top-level overview and using {{main}} to link to a new page entitled "History of Mario"." Bowser's article SHOULD get a split, pronto too. The only reason it hasn't happened is that IMO the initiative hasn't been taken yet (it's not an easy undertaking). I decided just today to take it.
- I saw a link to MarioWiki:Article size in the edit summary and it says that >100KB pages "almost certainly should be divided" so i think it's a rule here i guess. i actually think i approve of the rule because my computer in general sometimes lags when going on those articles -CoolNintendo
